IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?

Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk> Wed, 02 August 2000 14:23 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA29024 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA22560; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:22:45 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA22529; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21847; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:20:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (131.111.8.18 -> draco.cus.cam.ac.uk) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:20:34 -0400
Received: from ph10 (helo=localhost) by draco.cus.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #3) id 13JzNQ-0002ZV-00 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:20:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:20:08 +0100
From: Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?
In-Reply-To: <200008021413.e72ED8u00925@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0008021519380.29601-100000@draco.cus.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Eric Allman wrote:

> I agree that we should go with the ABNF.

So do I.

Philip

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email