Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs
Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk> Wed, 02 August 2000 14:22 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA28742 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA22221; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:52 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA22204; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA22188; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (131.111.8.18 -> draco.cus.cam.ac.uk) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:21:34 -0400
Received: from ph10 (helo=localhost) by draco.cus.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #3) id 13JzOO-0002aH-00 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:21:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:21:08 +0100
From: Philip Hazel <ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk>
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs
In-Reply-To: <200008021416.e72EG7u00945@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0008021520280.29601-100000@draco.cus.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Eric Allman wrote: > I don't see any reason to limit commands to four characters. As noted, > there are already commands that violate this. In particular, I would > not want anyone to think that "MAILFROM:<...>" is legal syntax, as > might be implied by this text. I suggest deleting "four letter" from > 2.4. I also see no reason to limit commands to four characters. Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
- smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Gregory Neil Shapiro
- smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buffers Gregory Neil Shapiro
- smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Gregory Neil Shapiro
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? John Beck
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Gregory Neil Shapiro
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… John Beck
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Eric Allman
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Eric Allman
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Eric Allman
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs John Beck
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Philip Hazel
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Philip Hazel
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Philip Hazel
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Eric Allman
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Bart Schaefer
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Bart Schaefer
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Keith Moore
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Keith Moore
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Keith Moore
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Dave Sill
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Dave Sill
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Russ Allbery
- Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs Lee Thompson
- Re: smtpupd-12: MAIL resets state tables and buff… Lee Thompson
- Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies? Lee Thompson