Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs

John Beck <jbeck@eng.sun.com> Wed, 02 August 2000 14:20 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA28173 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21624; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:19:27 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21602; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from playground.sun.com (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21589; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from playground.sun.com (192.9.5.5 -> playground.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:19:24 -0400
Received: from opal.eng.sun.com (sun-barr.Sun.COM [192.9.9.1]) by playground.sun.com (8.11.0+Sun/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e72EJHd10613; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by opal.eng.sun.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e72EJH1150725; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200008021419.e72EJH1150725@opal.eng.sun.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.2 06/08/2000
To: Eric Allman <eric+ietf@sendmail.org>
cc: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>, drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs
X-Image-URL: http://playground.sun.com/~jbeck/gif/Misc/john-face.jpg
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:16:07 PDT." <200008021416.e72EG7u00945@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
References: <200008021416.e72EG7u00945@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:19:17 -0400
From: John Beck <jbeck@eng.sun.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>

Gregory> Section 2.4 states, "All commands begin with a four letter command
Gregory> verb."  SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLS (RFC 2487)
Gregory> breaks this rule.  In light of this, should section 2.4's text be
Gregory> modified?

Eric> I don't see any reason to limit commands to four characters.  As noted,
Eric> there are already commands that violate this.  In particular, I would
Eric> not want anyone to think that "MAILFROM:<...>" is legal syntax, as might
Eric> be implied by this text.  I suggest deleting "four letter" from 2.4.

I support Eric's proposed modification.

-- John