Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs

Eric Allman <eric+ietf@sendmail.org> Wed, 02 August 2000 14:16 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA26890 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21141; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:16 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21124; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from knecht.Sendmail.ORG (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA21110; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from knecht.Sendmail.ORG (209.31.233.176 -> knecht.sendmail.org) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:16:13 -0400
Received: from jean-baptiste.sendmail.org (wireless-133-231.ietf.marconi.com [147.73.133.231]) by knecht.Sendmail.ORG (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e72EGAb28532; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jean-baptiste.sendmail.org (localhost.sendmail.org [127.0.0.1]) by jean-baptiste.sendmail.org (Switch-2.0.0/Switch-2.0.0) with ESMTP id e72EG7u00945; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200008021416.e72EG7u00945@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.2 06/08/2000
To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>
From: Eric Allman <eric+ietf@sendmail.org>
X-URL: http://WWW.Sendmail.ORG/~eric
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs
In-reply-to: Mail from Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net> dated Sun, 30 Jul 2000 21:36:46 PDT <14725.606.683615.90633@monkeyboy.gshapiro.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 07:16:07 -0700
Sender: eric@sendmail.org
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>

I don't see any reason to limit commands to four characters.  As noted,
there are already commands that violate this.  In particular, I would
not want anyone to think that "MAILFROM:<...>" is legal syntax, as
might be implied by this text.  I suggest deleting "four letter" from
2.4.

eric


============= In Reply To: ===========================================
: From:  Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>
: Subject:  smtpupd-12: Four letter command verbs
: Date:  Sun, 30 Jul 2000 21:36:46 -0700 (PDT)

: Section 2.4 states, "All commands begin with a four letter command verb."
: SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLS (RFC 2487) breaks this
: rule.  In light of this, should section 2.4's text be modified?