Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?
waldir moreira <faqzao@hotmail.com> Tue, 25 November 2014 10:08 UTC
Return-Path: <faqzao@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EC91A0099 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:08:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.391
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_91=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iz3lhWDz0j7s for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU004-OMC3S36.hotmail.com (blu004-omc3s36.hotmail.com [65.55.116.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4BF1A008D for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU175-W16 ([65.55.116.72]) by BLU004-OMC3S36.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:08:22 -0800
X-TMN: [iFfs40hHY016tczEBxhaAtDJxYIkxRXb]
X-Originating-Email: [faqzao@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU175-W16D05EBF47453B75991477CD730@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_0e9a30fc-529b-40bb-810e-e07c0ace1ddd_"
From: waldir moreira <faqzao@hotmail.com>
To: "dugdale@gmail.com" <dugdale@gmail.com>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:08:21 +0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CABv6xLs3d683OB36i7jij8Rk-hHoPGzu4f1c6+KoPGD30mnw9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU175-W413B0BBA8718E26DE20C80CD8E0@phx.gbl>, <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F94BC8B@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>, <BLU175-W39AF8A2B6DC3B68DA7C45EE28F0@phx.gbl>, <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F94D8BE@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>, <5464E625.7040309@cs.tcd.ie>, <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F94DB24@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>, <BLU175-W502CB8441E2508019434B5CD8C0@phx.gbl>, <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B5F94E100@ap-embx-sp10.RES.AD.JPL>, <5b0dd32d92f54054bd30bfcf838cb4d6@aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu>, <CABv6xLs3d683OB36i7jij8Rk-hHoPGzu4f1c6+KoPGD30mnw9w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2014 10:08:22.0229 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE76E050:01D00897]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/7mMUx2eq9zPtkSD1-dunjppsDaM
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:08:27 -0000
Dear Anders, What would be the best approach for continuing with the efforts towards the common framework?I'd be happy to contribute and as I can see there are other colleagues interested in such framework. Waldir > Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:24:31 -0200 > From: jcnobre@inf.ufrgs.br > To: Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu > CC: dtn-interest@irtf.org > Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > > Hi there. > It would be good to have a generalized framework, e.g. to evaluate > different routing algorithms. > Besides that, I think it is a nice way to realize how much interest > the DTNRG attracts after the DTNWG start. > Cheers. > > Jéferson Campos Nobre > PhD Student > Computer Networks Group - Institute of Informatics > Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul > http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~jcnobre > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Birrane, Edward J. > <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu> wrote: > > Waldir, Scott, > > > > > > > > I have been looking at the idea of contact inference engines for some time > > and I think there is something usable there. I’ve proposed some initial > > inference adapters relating to PROPHET and a generalized routing framework > > built on a modified contact graph. I would be happy (and excited) to > > continue this research with anyone interested and think it could be a > > valuable undertaking within DTNRG. > > > > > > > > -Ed > > > > > > > > --- > > Ed Birrane > > > > Principal Professional Staff, Space Exploration Sector > > > > Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory > > (W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839 > > > > > > > > > > From: dtn-interest [mailto:dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of > > Burleigh, Scott C (312B) > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 8:30 AM > > To: waldir moreira; dtn-interest@irtf.org > > > > > > Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > > > > > > > > Yes, that's just the sort of ecosystem I am hoping for. > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: dtn-interest [dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] on behalf of waldir > > moreira [faqzao@hotmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 4:50 AM > > To: dtn-interest@irtf.org > > Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > > > > Thats right, Scott. > > > > > > > > I think if we worked the generic routing framework as mentioned by Anders, > > we would certainly have an idea of the existing core routing algorithms that > > could be added to ION as to allow the feeding of the contact plan. > > > > dLife, SPRINT, SCORP, .. do consider the "ongoing basis" as to have a > > snapshot of the actual moment regarding relevant contact (considering the > > different levels of social interaction between nodes). This could probably > > make the collection of contact inference engines to allow the extended-CGR. > > > > The outcome would be a 'universal' routing solution that could be employed > > in sparse and dense DTN scenarios. > > > > Waldir > > > >> From: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov > >> To: dtn-interest@irtf.org > >> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:58:51 +0000 > >> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > >> > >> Thanks, Stephen, that will be extremely helpful when we get to the point > >> of having something to test. > >> > >> The other angle, which I thought Waldir was talking about, is development > >> of software that infers somewhat-probable contacts (from social media > >> interactions, contact history, whatever) on an ongoing basis, that could be > >> integrated with a CGR-based forwarding daemon. ION provides an open API for > >> inserting contacts into a node's contact plan, so I think this interface can > >> be kept pretty clean. Notionally, I would be glad to see any number of > >> clever contact inference engines operating concurrently and cooperating in > >> keeping a given node's contact plan as comprehensive and accurate as > >> possible, so that the extended-CGR forwarding based on that probabilistic > >> time-varying topology information can be made as efficient as possible. > >> > >> Scott > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Stephen Farrell [stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie] > >> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:11 AM > >> To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B); dtn-interest@irtf.org > >> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > >> > >> On 13/11/14 16:57, Burleigh, Scott C (312B) wrote: > >> > Yes, for the purposes of the development I was talking about it would > >> > be great to have a really capable source of somewhat-probable > >> > contacts. > >> > >> We put all the 2010 N4C contacts up on a web server. [1] > >> Someone (likely Elwyn or me;-) would probably have to help > >> deciphering formats but there's a bunch of them there and > >> some pictures [2] to help (and the code to generate all > >> those from DTN2 logs). > >> > >> We also have some others but 2010 is probably the most useful > >> set we have for remote area scenarios. > >> > >> S. > >> > >> [1] http://dtn.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/n4c-summer10/ > >> [2] http://down.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/summer10/contacts/pairs/pairs.html > >> > >> > > >> > Scott ________________________________ From: waldir moreira > >> > [waldir.aranha@outlook.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:35 > >> > AM To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B); dtn-interest@irtf.org Subject: RE: > >> > [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > >> > > >> > Thanks for your reply, Scott. > >> > > >> > So in other words, you think we should mature more the inference from > >> > social-based contacts, as to allow proper application to the CGR > >> > contact plan? > >> > > >> > Waldir > >> > > >> > > >> > ________________________________ From: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov > >> > To: dtn-interest@irtf.org Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:15:53 +0000 > >> > Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > >> > > >> > HI, Waldir. One possibility: we are starting to look at the > >> > possibility of basing a generic DTN routing framework on Contact > >> > Graph Routing, by extending the CGR notion of a "contact plan" to > >> > include not only scheduled contacts but also predicted contacts (that > >> > is, enabling association of a probability less than 1.0 with an > >> > identified contact). We think we've got a reasonable concept of how > >> > to use somewhat-probable contacts to direct forwarding efficiently in > >> > a general way, but that leaves wide open the question of how to > >> > populate the contact plan with those somewhat-probable contacts; the > >> > problem of inferring such things from social contacts or patterns of > >> > movement or whatever remains less-than-comprehensively solved. > >> > > >> > Scott ________________________________ From: dtn-interest > >> > [dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] on behalf of waldir moreira > >> > [faqzao@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:16 AM To: > >> > dtn-interest@irtf.org Subject: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? > >> > > >> > Dear colleagues, > >> > > >> > Recently our draft on social-aware opportunistic routing has expired > >> > (http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-moreira-dlife-04.txt). > >> > > >> > Despite of a first interest from the DTNRG by the time of its first > >> > appearance, our draft has not received any technical feedback as > >> > expected (it remained as individual submission and no stream > >> > defined). > >> > > >> > Thus, the intention of this email is to check with my colleagues > >> > whether there is any interest from the DTNRG (or its IETF WG > >> > counterpart) on new routing solutions. > >> > > >> > I recall that some emails were exchanged about a generic framework to > >> > allow better development of new solutions, but that didnt go far as > >> > well. > >> > > >> > Be it for new routing approaches or for a generic routing framework, > >> > we would be more than happy to contribute if there is still any > >> > interest from this RG in such direction. > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > > >> > Waldir Aranha Moreira Junior, Ph.D. Researcher at the Association for > >> > Research and Development in Cognition and People Centric Computing - > >> > COPELABS Invited Professor at University Lusofona - ULHT/ULP External > >> > collaborator of the Research Group on Computer Networks and > >> > Multimedia Communications - GERCOM/UFPA LinkedIn > >> > profile<http://www.linkedin.com/in/waldirmoreira> > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ dtn-interest mailing > >> > list dtn-interest@irtf.org > >> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ dtn-interest mailing > >> > list dtn-interest@irtf.org > >> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dtn-interest mailing list > >> dtn-interest@irtf.org > >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dtn-interest mailing list > > dtn-interest@irtf.org > > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest > > > > _______________________________________________ > dtn-interest mailing list > dtn-interest@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
- [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Junior
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Ciprian Dobre
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Anders Lindgren
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Birrane, Edward J.
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? Jéferson Campos Nobre
- Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions? waldir moreira