Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?

Yes, for the purposes of the development I was talking about it would be great to have a really capable source of somewhat-probable contacts.

Scott
________________________________
From: waldir moreira [waldir.aranha@outlook.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:35 AM
To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B); dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: RE: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?

Thanks for your reply, Scott.

So in other words, you think we should mature more the inference from social-based contacts, as to allow proper application to the CGR contact plan?

Waldir

________________________________
From: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:15:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?

HI, Waldir.  One possibility: we are starting to look at the possibility of basing a generic DTN routing framework on Contact Graph Routing, by extending the CGR notion of a "contact plan" to include not only scheduled contacts but also predicted contacts (that is, enabling association of a probability less than 1.0 with an identified contact).  We think we've got a reasonable concept of how to use somewhat-probable contacts to direct forwarding efficiently in a general way, but that leaves wide open the question of how to populate the contact plan with those somewhat-probable contacts; the problem of inferring such things from social contacts or patterns of movement or whatever remains less-than-comprehensively solved.

Scott
________________________________
From: dtn-interest [dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] on behalf of waldir moreira [faqzao@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:16 AM
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?

Dear colleagues,

Recently our draft on social-aware opportunistic routing has expired (http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-moreira-dlife-04.txt).

Despite of a first interest from the DTNRG by the time of its first appearance, our draft has not received any technical feedback as expected (it remained as individual submission and no stream defined).

Thus, the intention of this email is to check with my colleagues whether there is any interest from the DTNRG (or its IETF WG counterpart) on new routing solutions.

I recall that some emails were exchanged about a generic framework to allow better development of new solutions, but that didnt go far as well.

Be it for new routing approaches or for a generic routing framework, we would be more than happy to contribute if there is still any interest from this RG in such direction.

Best regards,

Waldir Aranha Moreira Junior, Ph.D.
Researcher at the Association for Research and Development in Cognition and People Centric Computing - COPELABS
Invited Professor at University Lusofona - ULHT/ULP
External collaborator of the Research Group on Computer Networks and Multimedia Communications - GERCOM/UFPA
LinkedIn profile<http://www.linkedin.com/in/waldirmoreira>

_______________________________________________ dtn-interest mailing list dtn-interest@irtf.org https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest