Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?

On 13/11/14 16:57, Burleigh, Scott C (312B) wrote:
> Yes, for the purposes of the development I was talking about it would
> be great to have a really capable source of somewhat-probable
> contacts.

We put all the 2010 N4C contacts up on a web server. [1]
Someone (likely Elwyn or me;-) would probably have to help
deciphering formats but there's a bunch of them there and
some pictures [2] to help (and the code to generate all
those from DTN2 logs).

We also have some others but 2010 is probably the most useful
set we have for remote area scenarios.

S.

[1] http://dtn.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/n4c-summer10/
[2] http://down.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/summer10/contacts/pairs/pairs.html

> 
> Scott ________________________________ From: waldir moreira
> [waldir.aranha@outlook.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:35
> AM To: Burleigh, Scott C (312B); dtn-interest@irtf.org Subject: RE:
> [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?
> 
> Thanks for your reply, Scott.
> 
> So in other words, you think we should mature more the inference from
> social-based contacts, as to allow proper application to the CGR
> contact plan?
> 
> Waldir
> 
> 
> ________________________________ From: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov 
> To: dtn-interest@irtf.org Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:15:53 +0000 
> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?
> 
> HI, Waldir.  One possibility: we are starting to look at the
> possibility of basing a generic DTN routing framework on Contact
> Graph Routing, by extending the CGR notion of a "contact plan" to
> include not only scheduled contacts but also predicted contacts (that
> is, enabling association of a probability less than 1.0 with an
> identified contact).  We think we've got a reasonable concept of how
> to use somewhat-probable contacts to direct forwarding efficiently in
> a general way, but that leaves wide open the question of how to
> populate the contact plan with those somewhat-probable contacts; the
> problem of inferring such things from social contacts or patterns of
> movement or whatever remains less-than-comprehensively solved.
> 
> Scott ________________________________ From: dtn-interest
> [dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] on behalf of waldir moreira
> [faqzao@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:16 AM To:
> dtn-interest@irtf.org Subject: [dtn-interest] New routing solutions?
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> Recently our draft on social-aware opportunistic routing has expired
> (http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-moreira-dlife-04.txt).
> 
> Despite of a first interest from the DTNRG by the time of its first
> appearance, our draft has not received any technical feedback as
> expected (it remained as individual submission and no stream
> defined).
> 
> Thus, the intention of this email is to check with my colleagues
> whether there is any interest from the DTNRG (or its IETF WG
> counterpart) on new routing solutions.
> 
> I recall that some emails were exchanged about a generic framework to
> allow better development of new solutions, but that didnt go far as
> well.
> 
> Be it for new routing approaches or for a generic routing framework,
> we would be more than happy to contribute if there is still any
> interest from this RG in such direction.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Waldir Aranha Moreira Junior, Ph.D. Researcher at the Association for
> Research and Development in Cognition and People Centric Computing -
> COPELABS Invited Professor at University Lusofona - ULHT/ULP External
> collaborator of the Research Group on Computer Networks and
> Multimedia Communications - GERCOM/UFPA LinkedIn
> profile<http://www.linkedin.com/in/waldirmoreira>
> 
> _______________________________________________ dtn-interest mailing
> list dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ dtn-interest mailing
> list dtn-interest@irtf.org 
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
> 