[e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Cases
"PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)" <pp3129@att.com> Wed, 19 May 2010 15:04 UTC
Return-Path: <pp3129@att.com>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508243A66B4 for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.371, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZtr1x3Pq3+y for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com (mail129.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D253A69A4 for <e2md@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: pp3129@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1274281434!27885174!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146]
Received: (qmail 31260 invoked from network); 19 May 2010 15:03:55 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-15.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 May 2010 15:03:55 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4JF3ZXZ000985 for <e2md@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:03:35 -0400
Received: from gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com (gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com [135.53.26.15]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4JF3Uhu000874 for <e2md@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:03:30 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:03:47 -0400
Message-ID: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B040143F4@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005171404110.16091@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Cases
Thread-Index: Acr1xFKNQ4yM6wo0TK+YD4hGImVBogBnlS2Q
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005161433580.31324@softronics.hoeneisen.ch><32FCCBEC-E8B1-45D9-A068-0B120AAADC55@rfc1035.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005171404110.16091@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
From: "PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)" <pp3129@att.com>
To: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" <e2md@ietf.org>
Subject: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Cases
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:04:10 -0000
As promised some words for the Global SP ID use case: Use RFC 3761 technology provide for the Carrier of Record for an E.164 number (as defined in RFC 5067) to publish the mapping of that E.164 to a globally defined identifier, specifically an IANA Enterprise Number as defined in RFC 2578. [fire away!] Penn Pfautz AT&T Access Management +1-732-420-4962 -----Original Message----- From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Hoeneisen Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:20 AM To: Jim Reid Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list Subject: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Cases (was RFC 5507 & RFC 5395) Hi Jim On Mon, 17 May 2010, Jim Reid wrote: > With that in mind, I make the following suggestion. Could whoever is in > charge of this BOF ask those who have use cases and requirements to submit > them and set a deadline for that input? If nothing is forthcoming, then there > isn't a problem to work on and we can all go home. And if we get that info, > there would at least be a basis for a problem statement that could then be > analysed and perhaps worked on. About Problem statement: Last week I sent out an email with Subject: "Action Required: Your version of the Problem statement needed", which pretty much covers this. As I have only seen a few answers, I maybe could send a reminder. About Requirements: A call for requirements sime weeks ago resulted in the following: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki/RequirementsList (AFAICR only Jay and Dean have been contributing so far.) About Use Cases: BTW: Long before the BoF I also publically asked for Use Cases, which is still the basis for the Use Cases we are discussing here. Details see E2MD archives. Wiki page under construction: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki/UseCases Wiki: Here the list of links to the Wiki pages: - Main E2MD Wiki Page: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki - Requirements: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki/RequirementsList - Use Cases (under construction) http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki/UseCases - Objections (Ticketing System) http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/report/10 I would wish the Wiki was more of a collaborative happening as opposed to one person doing all the work... cheers, Bernie _______________________________________________ e2md mailing list e2md@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md
- [e2md] RFC 5507 & RFC 5395 Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] RFC 5507 & RFC 5395 Jim Reid
- [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Ca… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- [e2md] the RFC5935 process Jim Reid
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Dean Willis
- Re: [e2md] the RFC5935 process Ray Bellis
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Richard Shockey
- [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Use Ca… PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Sumanth Channabasappa
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] Problem statement, Requirements and Us… Cartwright, Kenneth
- [e2md] Shall we go this way? (was Re: Problem sta… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [e2md] Shall we go this way? (was Re: Problem… Dave CROCKER