Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots

"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> Wed, 15 September 2010 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC903A6A0C for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cvJOLQQmIG8U for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADE53A688F for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.89.255.20] (port=50255 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1Ovien-000255-4x; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:27:37 -0400
Message-Id: <386593D7-1433-4C36-8DB8-BA78D0946583@bbn.com>
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
To: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC011C61FC@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:27:34 -0400
References: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC011C61FC@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:27:13 -0000

I disagree.  I think Brian had it right that it would be good if the  
ATOCA system could benefit from other lower-layer or domain-specific  
systems.
--Richard


On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:42 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote:

> Agree. ATOCA is not cell broadcast based alerting. That work is done  
> in 3GPP and ATIS. There is no relationship to the ATOCA work and PWS.
> ------Original Message------
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> To: mark.wood@engineer.com
> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
> Sent: Sep 14, 2010 7:30 AM
>
> Can I suggest you read the charter of ATOCA before introducing 4G  
> discussions to the meetings.
>
> It is not the function of ATOCA to define a replacement for cell  
> broadcast systems of warning.
>
> Keith
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wood
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:23 AM
>> To: Thomson, Martin
>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
>>
>>
>> Hi People;
>>
>> I am Mark Wood, the convener of the ITU-T SG2 liaison on
>> "multicast address space harmonization for civic purposes".
>>
>> As a matter of reference for your kind attention, I can take
>> a few minutes to describe the mechanism of cell broadcasting
>> in 2nd and 3rd generation mobile networks and explain the
>> ITU-T SG2 liaison, so that we can discuss if any of the
>> discoveries made there are of any relevance to the ATOCA
>> deliberations or not.
>>
>> The ITU is not seeking any infuence over IETF deliberations,
>> but the process at ITU has been on going for 4 years, and a
>> lot of discoveries were made in that time which you may find
>> interesting.
>>
>> The next ITU-T SG2 meeting is the week after the IETF, so I
>> will be in a position to relay to them any thoughts or
>> observations that you may have.
>> At the last ITU meeting Nov 2009, questions were raised on
>> the matter of 4G mobile networks and how they would
>> accommodate public warnings,
>
> ------Original Message Truncated------
>
> Brian K. Daly
>   Sent to you by AT&T...
>   America's Fastest Mobile Broadband
>       Network.  Rethink Possible.
>   +1.425.580.6873
> -------
> Sent from my Blackberry
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning