Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> Wed, 15 September 2010 03:27 UTC
Return-Path: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC903A6A0C for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cvJOLQQmIG8U for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADE53A688F for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.89.255.20] (port=50255 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1Ovien-000255-4x; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:27:37 -0400
Message-Id: <386593D7-1433-4C36-8DB8-BA78D0946583@bbn.com>
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
To: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC011C61FC@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:27:34 -0400
References: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC011C61FC@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:27:13 -0000
I disagree. I think Brian had it right that it would be good if the ATOCA system could benefit from other lower-layer or domain-specific systems. --Richard On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:42 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote: > Agree. ATOCA is not cell broadcast based alerting. That work is done > in 3GPP and ATIS. There is no relationship to the ATOCA work and PWS. > ------Original Message------ > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > To: mark.wood@engineer.com > Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots > Sent: Sep 14, 2010 7:30 AM > > Can I suggest you read the charter of ATOCA before introducing 4G > discussions to the meetings. > > It is not the function of ATOCA to define a replacement for cell > broadcast systems of warning. > > Keith > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wood >> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:23 AM >> To: Thomson, Martin >> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots >> >> >> Hi People; >> >> I am Mark Wood, the convener of the ITU-T SG2 liaison on >> "multicast address space harmonization for civic purposes". >> >> As a matter of reference for your kind attention, I can take >> a few minutes to describe the mechanism of cell broadcasting >> in 2nd and 3rd generation mobile networks and explain the >> ITU-T SG2 liaison, so that we can discuss if any of the >> discoveries made there are of any relevance to the ATOCA >> deliberations or not. >> >> The ITU is not seeking any infuence over IETF deliberations, >> but the process at ITU has been on going for 4 years, and a >> lot of discoveries were made in that time which you may find >> interesting. >> >> The next ITU-T SG2 meeting is the week after the IETF, so I >> will be in a position to relay to them any thoughts or >> observations that you may have. >> At the last ITU meeting Nov 2009, questions were raised on >> the matter of 4G mobile networks and how they would >> accommodate public warnings, > > ------Original Message Truncated------ > > Brian K. Daly > Sent to you by AT&T... > America's Fastest Mobile Broadband > Network. Rethink Possible. > +1.425.580.6873 > ------- > Sent from my Blackberry > _______________________________________________ > earlywarning mailing list > earlywarning@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Thomson, Martin
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Mark Wood
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Mark Wood
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots Scott O. Bradner