IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Atoca] Requirement D2: "Large Audience"

"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Sun, 16 January 2011 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D740E3A6E60 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEkkGQnU7SRW for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from csmailgw2.commscope.com (csmailgw2.commscope.com [198.135.207.242]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228C33A6CEF for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:41264 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw2.commscope.com with ESMTP id S531655Ab1APXPK (ORCPT <rfc822; earlywarning@ietf.org>); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:15:10 -0600
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:15:10 -0600
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:15:06 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Art Botterell <artbotterell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:15:04 +0800
Thread-Topic: [Atoca] Requirement D2: "Large Audience"
Thread-Index: Acu1kSZx02LQzsaJR2maLToInGbJVQAPvVXA
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03F52595D3@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <AC859123-98E0-4188-8898-0CBBDA567FBC@gmx.net> <A7EF592C-E85F-4FD1-9F69-C59327D735AC@gmail.com> <1285F7FB-FFBE-4B49-87F8-FCDCDF1F1AD3@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <1285F7FB-FFBE-4B49-87F8-FCDCDF1F1AD3@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw2.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: Martin.Thomson@andrew.com
Cc: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>, "earlywarning@ietf.org" <earlywarning@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Atoca] Requirement D2: "Large Audience"
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the IETF Authority-to-Citizen Alert \(atoca\) working group." <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:12:38 -0000

On Jan 15, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Art Botterell wrote:
> One difference in "broadcast" delivery is that it's frequntly
> impractical and/or undesirable to try to track individual deliveries or
> process individual responses.

If SIP is our delivery mechanism, can anything be done to suppress 200 responses to NOTIFY requests?  Is there any point if we're using acknowledged transport like TCP?  Is there a concern that unacknowledged packets (UDP) will get dropped?

The potential to create congestion worries me.

--Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email