IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT WG Rechartering

"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Tue, 28 October 2008 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ecrit-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1910D3A6C09; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7823A6C09 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2DW7lmNbL39 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771A83A6C03 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9SBhYdJ020498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:43:34 +0100
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9SBhVrv021099; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:43:33 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.12]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:43:30 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.15]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:43:30 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:43:27 +0200
Message-ID: <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162A5DE81@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <XFE-RTP-202X3cf3edn000001c6@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] ECRIT WG Rechartering
Thread-Index: Ack4dpbQ07KOClgVQQWZKoKkWzN96QAeqVfg
References: <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162943512@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net> <c33e922d0810270639q4244b373pdafcd1ec33661f24@mail.gmail.com> <XFE-RTP-202H71yEXUI000001a2@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com> <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162A5D89C@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net> <XFE-RTP-202X3cf3edn000001c6@xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: "ext James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes.ietf@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2008 11:43:30.0430 (UTC) FILETIME=[662DF9E0:01C938F2]
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Checked for Spam by eleven - eXpurgate www.eXpurgate.net
X-purgate-ID: 151667::081028124334-115F0BB0-A0111282/0-0/0-15
X-purgate-size: 606/0
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT WG Rechartering
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

>At 01:38 PM 10/27/2008, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>We in the group can make decisions at any time regardless of what was 
>>presented at the meeting.
>>I believe we should speed up a bit with our work.
>>
>>I also hope that you and Brian are going to update the 
>>PhoneBCP/Framework document so that we get that document out 
>of our way
>
>these are kinda held back by the idea of refusing the BYE 
>discussion, aren't they?

Nope. As mentioned in the initial plan for Phone BCP we would delete the
sentence about not sending a BYE. 

FINISH the document. 
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email