Re: [Ecrit] New Work
"Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Wed, 18 August 2010 00:20 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266C83A67E7 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.672
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.927, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CIhtveeYZT6z for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD653A6765 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU137-DS11 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:21:20 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [131.107.0.117]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <blu137-ds11D6C1B0E93C0FAAE7A333939D0@phx.gbl>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, 'Marc Linsner' <mlinsner@cisco.com>, 'ecrit' <ecrit@ietf.org>
References: <C88ACA24.27BFF%mlinsner@cisco.com> <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:21:19 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGKrAtEZ8AUUOCoPIzbGDAScf0u1AJTb3Cgk1Tg9wA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2010 00:21:20.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[480BB260:01CB3E6B]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:20:46 -0000
Getting PSAP callback "done" on schedule won't matter much if the resulting solution isn't implemented and deployed. So I wouldn't worry as much about IETF schedules as much as much as deployability. -----Original Message----- From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James M. Polk Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:53 PM To: Marc Linsner; 'ecrit' Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work I will commit to work on the data-only ID, and possibly psap-callback. I think I share Hannu's concerns about psap-callback taking so long to get done. I mean, in 6 months this WG will have only 3 docs to work on, surely we can get this one done sooner if we try. Otherwise, the proposed milestones appear fine to me. James At 09:08 AM 8/13/2010, Marc Linsner wrote: >We recently asked for any objections to taking on the following >documents as workgroup items. We have consensus to take this work on, >now we have to commit to a realistic timeframe for completion. We're >suggesting the following and would like your comments to include: > >1) Are willing to work/contribute on the document? >2) Are willing to commit to the timeframe shown? > >The chairs commit to hosting virtual interim meetings at intervals >necessary to meet the timeframes. > >Mar 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data Apr 2011 - >draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea Dec 2011 - >draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access >Jan 2012 - draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location >Mar 2012 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback > >We realize the timeframes appear to out there but past experience tells >us to be conservative. There's no penalty for getting them done early. > >We MUST have commitment to work on these before the ADs will give us >the milestones. > >Please send your comments including which drafts you are willing to >work on by COB Friday, August 20, 2010. > >Thanks, > >-Marc, Richard, Roger- > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ecrit mailing list >Ecrit@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Patel, Milan
- [Ecrit] New Work Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work hannu.hietalahti
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Kroeselberg, Dirk (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Stephen McCann
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] New Work hannu.hietalahti