Re: [Ecrit] New Work

"Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Wed, 18 August 2010 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266C83A67E7 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.672
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.672 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.927, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CIhtveeYZT6z for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD653A6765 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU137-DS11 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:21:20 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [131.107.0.117]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <blu137-ds11D6C1B0E93C0FAAE7A333939D0@phx.gbl>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, 'Marc Linsner' <mlinsner@cisco.com>, 'ecrit' <ecrit@ietf.org>
References: <C88ACA24.27BFF%mlinsner@cisco.com> <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:21:19 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGKrAtEZ8AUUOCoPIzbGDAScf0u1AJTb3Cgk1Tg9wA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2010 00:21:20.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[480BB260:01CB3E6B]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:20:46 -0000

Getting PSAP callback "done" on schedule won't  matter much if the resulting
solution isn't implemented and deployed.   So I wouldn't worry as much about
IETF schedules as much as much as deployability.  

-----Original Message-----
From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
James M. Polk
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Marc Linsner; 'ecrit'
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work

I will commit to work on the data-only ID, and possibly psap-callback.

I think I share Hannu's concerns about psap-callback taking so long to get
done. I mean, in 6 months this WG will have only 3 docs to work on, surely
we can get this one done sooner if we try.

Otherwise, the proposed milestones appear fine to me.

James

At 09:08 AM 8/13/2010, Marc Linsner wrote:
>We recently asked for any objections to taking on the following 
>documents as workgroup items.  We have consensus to take this work on, 
>now we have to commit to a realistic timeframe for completion.  We're 
>suggesting the following and would like your comments to include:
>
>1) Are willing to work/contribute on the document?
>2) Are willing to commit to the timeframe shown?
>
>The chairs commit to hosting virtual interim meetings at intervals 
>necessary to meet the timeframes.
>
>Mar 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data Apr 2011 - 
>draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea Dec 2011 - 
>draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
>Jan 2012 - draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
>Mar 2012 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
>
>We realize the timeframes appear to out there but past experience tells 
>us to be conservative.  There's no penalty for getting them done early.
>
>We MUST have commitment to work on these before the ADs will give us 
>the milestones.
>
>Please send your comments including which drafts you are willing to 
>work on by COB Friday, August 20, 2010.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Marc, Richard, Roger-
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit