IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] New Work

Stephen McCann <mccann.stephen@gmail.com> Tue, 17 August 2010 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mccann.stephen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F4A3A697F for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xhW7GpZRNwLW for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C909D3A687B for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2963530bwz.31 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=itRYGqlyZ1cQr0STwP/mkk4Dcmt4HXp3jB971F5EV2Q=; b=tIVqbkHZksDaM9fExvJ/B8BlM0Xt3h9eYGQQvx+uSk0HY2/SjXlwGrP7Occ/imkK3R 3jy3SxE2CFpKPcDSr54B9APzo7McxE1HlWtstIdkOoE1W4kBEIAstrnuK6ujRqaCgLjT pHk404qjreJ13Z0F1Du8xJIdKcoDUzm3t/02o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JTyB0MMTq3RaRVKRL3BbUtALMEleKw4Be8b42/Fe/6gfs0sQ43uyBnR6pEJXd/qbg8 0k7U/jeuV0d+uve+UawmkgmdZMsvjhli8KSHnBzjqsYl7wtZw8PDA0q9f6OLLxN4bqv0 kU3tMaXvlu5hiQGi3lxu0OCF7dh/dL0PVBQkA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.60.5 with SMTP id n5mr4450977bkh.162.1282057524663; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.84.228 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8C51C7A529FC9D49843ACF5AE2FFBF6702E6220E@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
References: <A99B171D26E1564B92D36826128CD6615D92E0F4EE@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <8C51C7A529FC9D49843ACF5AE2FFBF6702E6220E@DEMUEXC030.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:05:24 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimU=LgL1QXBUPg9eXXEMRB-Kn7A-p-N0pSHfuid@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen McCann <mccann.stephen@gmail.com>
To: ecrit@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:04:51 -0000

Mark,
       I'm also content to work on
draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access within the specified
deadlines.

Kind regards

Stephen

On 17 August 2010 13:31, Kroeselberg, Dirk (NSN - DE/Munich)
<dirk.kroeselberg@nsn.com> wrote:
> the same is true for me. Deadline looks fine.
>
> Dirk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext Gabor.Bajko@nokia.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:22 AM
> To: ecrit@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
>
> I am willing to work on draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access.
> The deadline seems realistic to me.
>
> - gabor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext Marc Linsner
> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 7:09 AM
> To: 'ecrit'
> Subject: [Ecrit] New Work
>
> We recently asked for any objections to taking on the following
> documents as
> workgroup items.  We have consensus to take this work on, now we have to
> commit to a realistic timeframe for completion.  We're suggesting the
> following and would like your comments to include:
>
> 1) Are willing to work/contribute on the document?
> 2) Are willing to commit to the timeframe shown?
>
> The chairs commit to hosting virtual interim meetings at intervals
> necessary
> to meet the timeframes.
>
> Mar 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
> Apr 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea
> Dec 2011 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
> Jan 2012 - draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
> Mar 2012 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
>
> We realize the timeframes appear to out there but past experience tells
> us
> to be conservative.  There's no penalty for getting them done early.
>
> We MUST have commitment to work on these before the ADs will give us the
> milestones.
>
> Please send your comments including which drafts you are willing to work
> on
> by COB Friday, August 20, 2010.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Marc, Richard, Roger-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email