Re: [Ecrit] New Work

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 18 August 2010 00:28 UTC

Message-Id: <201008180028.o7I0SYdO004822@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:28:33 -0500
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, 'Marc Linsner' <mlinsner@cisco.com>, 'ecrit' <ecrit@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <blu137-ds11D6C1B0E93C0FAAE7A333939D0@phx.gbl>
References: <C88ACA24.27BFF%mlinsner@cisco.com> <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com> <blu137-ds11D6C1B0E93C0FAAE7A333939D0@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
Precedence: list

fair

but Hannu was most likely correct that if this takes as long as till 
spring `12, then it'll miss an entire window into 3GPP for 
deployment, which is (at least one of) the largest group(s) wanting 
this spec`d in the IETF, right?

I'm not always a fan of 3GPP, but their requirements should (i.e., 
can) be a goal for us here, right?

James

At 07:21 PM 8/17/2010, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>Getting PSAP callback "done" on schedule won't  matter much if the resulting
>solution isn't implemented and deployed.   So I wouldn't worry as much about
>IETF schedules as much as much as deployability.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>James M. Polk
>Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:53 PM
>To: Marc Linsner; 'ecrit'
>Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
>
>I will commit to work on the data-only ID, and possibly psap-callback.
>
>I think I share Hannu's concerns about psap-callback taking so long to get
>done. I mean, in 6 months this WG will have only 3 docs to work on, surely
>we can get this one done sooner if we try.
>
>Otherwise, the proposed milestones appear fine to me.
>
>James
>
>At 09:08 AM 8/13/2010, Marc Linsner wrote:
> >We recently asked for any objections to taking on the following
> >documents as workgroup items.  We have consensus to take this work on,
> >now we have to commit to a realistic timeframe for completion.  We're
> >suggesting the following and would like your comments to include:
> >
> >1) Are willing to work/contribute on the document?
> >2) Are willing to commit to the timeframe shown?
> >
> >The chairs commit to hosting virtual interim meetings at intervals
> >necessary to meet the timeframes.
> >
> >Mar 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data Apr 2011 -
> >draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea Dec 2011 -
> >draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
> >Jan 2012 - draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
> >Mar 2012 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
> >
> >We realize the timeframes appear to out there but past experience tells
> >us to be conservative.  There's no penalty for getting them done early.
> >
> >We MUST have commitment to work on these before the ADs will give us
> >the milestones.
> >
> >Please send your comments including which drafts you are willing to
> >work on by COB Friday, August 20, 2010.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >-Marc, Richard, Roger-
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ecrit mailing list
> >Ecrit@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

Re: [Ecrit] New Work Patel, Milan
[Ecrit] New Work Marc Linsner
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Brian Rosen
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Bernard Aboba
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [Ecrit] New Work hannu.hietalahti
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Gabor.Bajko
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Kroeselberg, Dirk (NSN - DE/Munich)
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Stephen McCann
Re: [Ecrit] New Work James M. Polk
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Bernard Aboba
Re: [Ecrit] New Work James M. Polk
Re: [Ecrit] New Work Thomson, Martin
Re: [Ecrit] New Work hannu.hietalahti