Re: [Ecrit] New Work

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 17 August 2010 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00B03A690C for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.264, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0F4L+IgdnKP for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F373A683A for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,224,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="234457153"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2010 23:53:06 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8715.cisco.com [10.99.80.22]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7HNr6VL021116; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:53:06 GMT
Message-Id: <201008172353.o7HNr6VL021116@sj-core-3.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:53:05 -0500
To: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>, 'ecrit' <ecrit@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C88ACA24.27BFF%mlinsner@cisco.com>
References: <C88ACA24.27BFF%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] New Work
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:52:37 -0000

I will commit to work on the data-only ID, and possibly psap-callback.

I think I share Hannu's concerns about psap-callback taking so long 
to get done. I mean, in 6 months this WG will have only 3 docs to 
work on, surely we can get this one done sooner if we try.

Otherwise, the proposed milestones appear fine to me.

James

At 09:08 AM 8/13/2010, Marc Linsner wrote:
>We recently asked for any objections to taking on the following documents as
>workgroup items.  We have consensus to take this work on, now we have to
>commit to a realistic timeframe for completion.  We're suggesting the
>following and would like your comments to include:
>
>1) Are willing to work/contribute on the document?
>2) Are willing to commit to the timeframe shown?
>
>The chairs commit to hosting virtual interim meetings at intervals necessary
>to meet the timeframes.
>
>Mar 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-additional-data
>Apr 2011 - draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea
>Dec 2011 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-unauthenticated-access
>Jan 2012 - draft-tschofenig-ecrit-trustworthy-location
>Mar 2012 - draft-schulzrinne-ecrit-psap-callback
>
>We realize the timeframes appear to out there but past experience tells us
>to be conservative.  There's no penalty for getting them done early.
>
>We MUST have commitment to work on these before the ADs will give us the
>milestones.
>
>Please send your comments including which drafts you are willing to work on
>by COB Friday, August 20, 2010.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Marc, Richard, Roger-
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit