Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
James Kinney <jkinney@indigital.net> Tue, 30 August 2022 12:04 UTC
Return-Path: <jkinney@indigital.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C74C14CE2A for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=indigital.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4JZ7-XfBn9f for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01BEC14CE23 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id s11so13843638edd.13 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=indigital.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=7+iRpiEL7yjx/r4mYuIFw0z+EjjvLp/4xYtMNwcVAsA=; b=KBN51UySbe0xwZyqLBTRU5oJyUmQ9K+uB5lgQw4Up4kx6rqv6Rjsox+iJfFNsB1+nf XQFF+MZCK2k+YO8MdwdTeYleb6q++qEjUVAVjaB6rwe8qMFq+kKov82E3HK0sU/Wp7p2 DXWB50y4mjFXI9nBzu+Qm2OlPu613er6/r6PA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=7+iRpiEL7yjx/r4mYuIFw0z+EjjvLp/4xYtMNwcVAsA=; b=yjgJg47ErWs0cxprA+6oHt0xmLgtn5CJkgZn8biydbDgS8D27YqUHI8Ov3FVUFURje qvtXx9AaqSXWPAV4E2nnsYR367j9WN4z5xL3wnUfcH/ZugOx5f+bAmKZ3LAsgK4btT8H +/DHUC/rqoBX2nSvt3ZZSb31pE8Fq5jD/kJuzuThJAbXSN1yyrgKC42rlrvPaRBm4NPl ZR5WuknzESX6G+AOBtW/lGs4RXeROzWYdQ+36WSe0pUn624tVEDb/ia3OJAyWakwOlPW ZfIx5aSo4KYF9J9sQt1u4Xkdrh8n72su6gbsRs2xvyixNA++r3BcM/0ZjW4DZ9I81eCH Xv7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3N7s5jnN5lrlLhE6+9ghcdCOZHjPfZu9hQmTShZMcO+FeNJQuu r3BNnGclARcqaz9khlithRsvtbTHgoQg+M9B9AKC0vpsE+wm7Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR60YQDo8iBAbnBbRYGoyLGHK033ThBlcDeS7gxaSCbQjzFJDsT1CjnnTU0aB/YlzTsZ+b9QmRctn8r0qbvTXA4=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d9cd:0:b0:448:1b9f:d8c2 with SMTP id v13-20020aa7d9cd000000b004481b9fd8c2mr12214311eds.43.1661861046356; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
From: James Kinney <jkinney@indigital.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:03:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGmtXOpfz6b_3i+zbPc5HzJWSfopFCVSfGwZFrZXYooyKtuh8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055a87505e7742dcb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/HEdRzV2W5mp-S2DedLllhVGvs3I>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:04:12 -0000
Yes, I support this document. Best regards, *James Kinney* *Chief Innovation Officer | INdigital * *direct: 260.469.2132* *email: *jkinney@indigital.net *main office: *877.469.2010 *website: *indigital.net *address: *1616 Directors Row, Fort Wayne, IN 46808 *join us online:* Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/INdigital911/> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/indigital> | Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/indigital911> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential. It is intended to be received by the individual or entity named above. If the reader or this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination, or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, notify the sender by return email, and delete this email and any attachments from your system. On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:10 AM Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote: > Members of ECRIT, > > Please respond to the question: Should the ECRIT WG adopt > draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01 as a WG document? > > Please do not ignore this message; the chairs need to see positive > support for adoption. You can respond with "yes" or "no" or something > else (e.g., "yes with the following changes...."), but PLEASE RESPOND. > > Thank you, > > --Randall > > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >
- [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brandon Abley
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Theresa Reese
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dwight Purtle
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Michael Smith
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Victor Burton
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Jeff Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Henry Unger
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Kinney
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Banks
- [Ecrit] Objet : PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG ado… Guy Caron
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Stephen O'Conor
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain