Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
Stephen O'Conor <oconor.ecrit@gmail.com> Wed, 31 August 2022 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <oconor.ecrit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C523C15AE20 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZlGpvk6y6w7 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C43FC14CE44 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id j14so11033076lfu.4 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=iMNiEcx9le3BrMl25kBknpsoGEC7TJY9r4XupuIyETg=; b=jcqy3ad/DBbVmhbFdtL51m8Kh42LHxGK1QHTUkSRje8+CgAk+rUsKUeMnn2hKN2eVb x94hNg5YYY9i4wAAfZFslrnRRNnyhQG9PSzx0b+ub1xgBV44aKFpkVZxqONEvjJ+8o7g bJg1XrzEuAp+czUw8ELOSWf5BBVgFD1FWcpPiiFf4DFmqmBiIFXYXPo7oPZbHjpkkthT Hj/PjihaaHg0ZwZc2IgnkowVj1HVoAvWKllL/pCERgqpjVstlDyQo9rV0VORdArL4yuz bL4Jyd4TWWjWZSDe36iX7dGxRQ9dEQdreYxe12tmkfzGs1pih25Q0+eTFsJkwR60Xc/1 Wi5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=iMNiEcx9le3BrMl25kBknpsoGEC7TJY9r4XupuIyETg=; b=PD8QyqbJY5X9IgoJmXtLGHN0XkL/PsXK+xK5ay73y6UXvMAlF0nn316wgYH6TtXA4x KY7FfGJ5tNfL9vWZmyNUxy5YHoeSC0zS9K/dqEoOclAmuUTEonBYOfr65gC0KI8nT1Lv Md4NIcQy7Xs9oBz67uBUR9kKXKHXswBteCaw/QsbYnEovuahOUAvqGA54igkIUKwu4BN uBewnlQfz8LhbUMczz/EnbI1xxkRpkB8z6WiNbSD7qGwg/jm9riwmu5NvLL5XUxikb8L 3wGvpqWH7ly1RcpKEMYCJu393WEDFsuO1n1tc1T4tMCM6pwxBaYCGKav4WXLypmDD63C Yb2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo05c47zpInahcRnk/Siw85jeqjt+2X3k6oDD96WXLdD2ErTZ+wG lI69RW6mEqR2HLDzD9sFmVcYj8yfZcVTkaIS1X8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Gd0yNUiKH/CqaLRAdzfKoHHmFEJIeN3GujW9PMx8ZqxGe6prABmp5XVA4SzULYXJFhbbW2p8GuSQ+AHZEM14=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31d6:b0:492:c0ae:54d8 with SMTP id j22-20020a05651231d600b00492c0ae54d8mr11067229lfe.214.1661974558462; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
From: Stephen O'Conor <oconor.ecrit@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:35:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CA++FFR7bsLPfOyJqaKGdUKfNk3jysx==EnZLqyaYFFXp017rcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ed50d05e78e9bdc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/lOgDvF0VZPEFGdQ5YKdka8op0pw>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:36:02 -0000
I support adoption of draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01 as a WG document. Steve O'Conor On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:10 AM Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote: > Members of ECRIT, > > Please respond to the question: Should the ECRIT WG adopt > draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01 as a WG document? > > Please do not ignore this message; the chairs need to see positive > support for adoption. You can respond with "yes" or "no" or something > else (e.g., "yes with the following changes...."), but PLEASE RESPOND. > > Thank you, > > --Randall > > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >
- [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brandon Abley
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Theresa Reese
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dwight Purtle
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Michael Smith
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Victor Burton
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Jeff Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Henry Unger
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Kinney
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Banks
- [Ecrit] Objet : PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG ado… Guy Caron
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Stephen O'Conor
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain