IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?

Henry Unger <hunger@pulsiam.com> Mon, 29 August 2022 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <hunger@pulsiam.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70BAC15E412 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiMHEF47vVgV for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux.hitech.com (linux.hitech.com [12.31.179.88]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F32C1527A3 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cHVsc2lhbS5jb20=
Received: from [192.77.217.217] ([192.77.217.217]) (authenticated user hunger@pulsiam.com) by linux.hitech.com (Kerio Connect 9.4.1 patch 1) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:43:24 -0700
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:43:22 -0700
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Index: Adi7uYFLAAAoFNTGKBQA7sgRIL7pFAAJg+5w
Message-ID: <526603e1-7974-482a-a9c3-4286f87d8500@pulsiam.com>
References: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>
X-Mailer: Kerio Outlook Connector (Offline Edition) (9.4.1.6445 T1)
From: Henry Unger <hunger@pulsiam.com>
To: 'Randall Gellens' <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>, 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/gSDEEsXb_AfCViELUMLyj3maI18>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:43:29 -0000

yes

-----Original Message-----
From: Ecrit <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Randall Gellens
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 8:10 AM
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?

Members of ECRIT,

Please respond to the question: Should the ECRIT WG adopt 
draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01 as a WG document?

Please do not ignore this message; the chairs need to see positive 
support for adoption. You can respond with "yes" or "no" or something 
else (e.g., "yes with the following changes...."), but PLEASE RESPOND.

Thank you,

--Randall

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email