Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Wed, 15 March 2023 23:10 UTC
Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7F2C1524B4 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1a9zw2XN85Qw for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65B9C1526FF for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [99.111.97.131] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:10:42 -0700
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
To: Dan Mongrain <dan.mongrain@motorolasolutions.com>
Cc: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>, ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:10:06 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <E5BA8958-E758-44B3-88C8-56E831BE9A0C@randy.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKB0ssF-AeBMm0-vH0jeRAOoYr6-Zo56ecohk=Ek2Mo_RCnGJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org> <1EA3E530-CC3F-4E16-8EAC-FDC0DD0FFD80@gmail.com> <8FA8FDF8-F56D-40F4-97A3-123282BCF8AF@brianrosen.net> <9F5E19E4-6F10-4001-A327-1D6E41DD9C4C@gmail.com> <28C7A7F9-99C4-4BD5-AE4B-17EE3676B7AA@randy.pensive.org> <CAKB0ssFkkbVbsk_wvRj0u1ZV71iLh4D_d+m2x0S6LA2dJJpMxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKB0ssF-AeBMm0-vH0jeRAOoYr6-Zo56ecohk=Ek2Mo_RCnGJg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_84DBC1A1-057F-4398-ACB1-DA61A01DEF7C_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[212, 2656], "uuid":"6C52E367-6A6D-43CD-BBF8-01B9CEF0F90F"}]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/WaeVNrsWGrC3wQYkHdH0NTJXYTU>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:10:55 -0000
Hi Dan, The WG adopted the document last year. We're currently waiting on a revision (the current draft expired) and of course WG members to review it. --Randall On 15 Mar 2023, at 13:21, Dan Mongrain wrote: > BUMP! > > > *Dan Mongrain, eng.*Principal Engineer, Standards > *Motorola Solutions* > > *o*: +1.819.931.2129 > *m*: +1.613.558.0764 > e: Dan.Mongrain@MotorolaSolutions.com > www.linkedin.com/in/DanMongrain > > *[image: > https://www.motorolasolutions.com/content/dam/msi/images/logos/corporate/msiemailsignature.png]* > > > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:34 PM Dan Mongrain < > dan.mongrain@motorolasolutions.com> wrote: > >> Where are we with regard to getting this adopted and the registries >> created in IANA? The lack of authoritative registries to go along >> with the >> authoritative standards and schemas is becoming a problem... >> >> Dan >> >> >> *Dan Mongrain, eng.*Principal Engineer, Standards >> *Motorola Solutions* >> >> *o*: +1.819.931.2129 >> *m*: +1.613.558.0764 >> e: Dan.Mongrain@MotorolaSolutions.com >> www.linkedin.com/in/DanMongrain >> >> *[image: >> https://www.motorolasolutions.com/content/dam/msi/images/logos/corporate/msiemailsignature.png]* >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:51 PM Randall Gellens >> <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 30 Aug 2022, at 11:58, James Winterbottom wrote: >>> >>>> I don’t think that RFC 8373 does what I need as it focuses on >>>> language in the SDP which isn’t going to suit my need as I >>>> won’t >>>> have SDP at that point and may not at all in some cases. >>>> >>>> These tags have use way beyond SIP and protocol methods, which is >>>> why >>>> I was asking. >>> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> When I read your first message I thought you were asking for >>> registry >>> entries for >>> "urn:service:emergency:responder.translation.language.spoken" or >>> something like that, i.e., registry entries enabling a LoST query to >>> find translation services available in a location. Now, I think >>> you're >>> asking for something else. While, as Brian says, this draft probably >>> isn't the place for what you want, I am curious as to what it is. >>> >>> --Randall >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ecrit mailing list >>> Ecrit@ietf.org >>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ecrit&d=DwIGaQ&c=q3cDpHe1hF8lXU5EFjNM_C93KOmcBXCBnhee2v6PYlc&r=n9aaU9xSQM4-mK_yF4tJzi7SeOWS3tTUWut1BhcRBI5vMR5LUWrTKzC_1DF8wC_4&m=_4eBUcM2iUw4sqx5aiUvH09WojyO6LyPC3KOnjOhNHsFUZFrW0YH7k-iTw-iWrC3&s=_wpkYkjY54aUdW2jbEmTDx6zRjquKDhEXtotU88383g&e= >>> >>> >> > > -- > > > *For more information on how and why we collect your personal > information, please visit our Privacy Policy > <https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/about/privacy-policy.html?elqTrackId=8980d888905940e39a2613a7a3dcb0a7&elqaid=2786&elqat=2#privacystatement> > .*
- [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brandon Abley
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Theresa Reese
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dwight Purtle
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Michael Smith
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Victor Burton
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Jeff Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Henry Unger
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Kinney
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… James Winterbottom
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Banks
- [Ecrit] Objet : PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG ado… Guy Caron
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Stephen O'Conor
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt d… Dan Mongrain