IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?

Brandon Abley <babley@nena.org> Mon, 29 August 2022 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <babley@nena.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6D8C15A731 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4QphB6ShHNRQ for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp79.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp79.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76817C157B3A for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp192.mex06.mlsrvr.com (unknown [184.106.73.70]) by smtp26.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 7C66EE03D0; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MBX12C-ORD1.mex06.mlsrvr.com (172.29.1.34) by MBX12D-ORD1.mex06.mlsrvr.com (172.29.1.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.36; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:49:28 -0500
Received: from MBX12C-ORD1.mex06.mlsrvr.com ([fe80::2090:c2f2:4284:3d80]) by MBX12C-ORD1.mex06.mlsrvr.com ([fe80::2090:c2f2:4284:3d80%24]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.036; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:49:28 -0500
From: Brandon Abley <babley@nena.org>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
CC: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
Thread-Index: AQHYu7l7m8eFHdBxl0Clc2BtwXfOXK3GUnQA//+z8J4=
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:49:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CH2PR19MB38137D5FEA917F0DE442A538AD769@CH2PR19MB3813.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <19072608-033F-495E-A711-1CDC6568586F@randy.pensive.org>, <C713B8AF-5093-4CC4-A784-EE002A5159F6@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <C713B8AF-5093-4CC4-A784-EE002A5159F6@brianrosen.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CH2PR19MB38137D5FEA917F0DE442A538AD769CH2PR19MB3813namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Classification-ID: f2fbbdc3-a50d-4f93-a009-efd51f76c691-2-1
X-Sender-ID: babley@nena.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/Rhy9A5ujB5kRhl1-RsMAg8KUJ7o>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:49:34 -0000

I am also biased but I will also say yes!

Brandon Abley

Director of Technology
NENA: The 9-1-1 Association
babley@nena.org<mailto:babley@nena.org>
m: +1.202.618.4401<tel:+12026184401>

________________________________
From: Ecrit <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022, 11:21
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PLEASE RESPOND: Should the WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01?

Yes (but I am biased)

> On Aug 29, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote:
>
> Members of ECRIT,
>
> Please respond to the question: Should the ECRIT WG adopt draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency-registries-01 as a WG document?
>
> Please do not ignore this message; the chairs need to see positive support for adoption. You can respond with "yes" or "no" or something else (e.g., "yes with the following changes...."), but PLEASE RESPOND.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --Randall
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email