IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Tue, 29 November 2016 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD13129CD2 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:01:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <eZDIHJKyr6sS>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZDIHJKyr6sS for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9326129CC5 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:00:30 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240606d463b8de548d@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <205FED72-32AA-494B-A2B0-3BD579BE9FD3@salsgiver.com>
References: <AM5PR0701MB2468062E91B51B26AC2396DBE5B70@AM5PR0701MB2468.eurprd07.pro d.outlook.com> <AM5PR0701MB246818833BDFCDA9E5AB9876E58A0@AM5PR0701MB2468.eurprd07.pro d.outlook.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4BEB11F2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <205FED72-32AA-494B-A2B0-3BD579BE9FD3@salsgiver.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:00:28 -0800
To: Brian Rosen <br@salsgiver.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/MGuLNZrDatHnC_junYhwlDR9dtQ>
Cc: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:01:04 -0000

At 3:28 PM -0500 11/29/16, Brian Rosen wrote:

>  Despite your characterization, there is no technical issue here. 
> Everyone agrees on how the mechanism works.  There is an editorial 
> issue on interpreting the word "attached".  I don't object to 
> wordsmithing to make it more clear, but it's not a technical 
> problem and it can be dealt with any time before publication.

I agree and plan to add clarifying wording as part of IETF Last Call.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
                                                    --Albert Einstein

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email