Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"

Ivo Sedlacek <> Wed, 30 November 2016 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C34129614 for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:53:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAUYz3Pc3EdX for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:52:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB1D129BD4 for <>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:51:50 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-c294498000000c18-23-583e9324f90f
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F4.D4.03096.4239E385; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:51:28 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1-ericsson-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YMVrr7W9H087UwOA9bShffEQBuw/Lcnnxb2VieYhpGM=; b=VREUZ97cOTTn6WAFuuJt9OL5DADFM0yJLf3ySLItqsJDqycGwl6yL4XBcfT/4UiBl1aXDKB9LTHdBiOjYml10kkqEPXeuD606+9Rr0vhvUfQRDI5OUHHpvoZ5J1FRwrV3fLWZbZFE52yffHICzfbaCi0jcsFoEbd97cXLRrCTqk=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.5; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:27 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0761.009; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:27 +0000
From: Ivo Sedlacek <>
To: Brian Rosen <>, Christer Holmberg <>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
Thread-Index: AdJFbsXsFLqBou5eRfmZkKIHQi68XQD77loQAEcH03AAASC2gAAZtXww
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:51:27 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-ld-processed: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f,ExtAddr
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6446ecfa-d636-431d-8281-08d418fe12a0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2465;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2465; 7:96nn16Y6CAy8jpinD/Wd/Lxez7XK9bOLW1Ys/FL+Zwj597kIvOPFtAtGennn0rc+bImIRoAxYVt7HSXqj/zHhHli27zlN9hNgQDuJUs4ZT7/UxEBhfWuvGGymnj+zsVeEGsvDjD9ylRVHjkiooYR3rxMFA/hG/Md1Va4hbv3I6SmGFrbFR3vCPv3i05L5aSoiiOFHbc/ftPVzttBI7etBQldknkGq/LZRG/bICMKEau9BrDBOazSf30nqbk/qxO650RNB+SN8tIa9whb9L5QRnkzAw2acswqprZvH40HkTv/CjMHGy59m9TY/lmvohsTKhv82kvD3dQJwc56LR0LkzceMGbSSVLwkO2Mx1bKw49mj782AROx0BDQuFqpWDm6B05e9au9P3IWK6n1xjOOtp4OLpxzeQ1sE+V+bVi0s2JSuuVYriI+mp5A1qDCi1+twrzzOeu+v5MNM02EyTKzEg==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2465; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2465;
x-forefront-prvs: 0142F22657
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(24454002)(6636002)(7696004)(2950100002)(6862003)(7846002)(7736002)(33656002)(74316002)(5660300001)(101416001)(305945005)(3280700002)(3660700001)(50986999)(66066001)(54356999)(76176999)(122556002)(76576001)(9686002)(8676002)(81156014)(81166006)(8936002)(97736004)(5001770100001)(92566002)(3846002)(77096006)(102836003)(189998001)(68736007)(4326007)(5890100001)(2906002)(6116002)(2900100001)(93886004)(230783001)(6506003)(38730400001)(39450400002)(105586002)(39410400001)(106356001)(86362001)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2465;; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Nov 2016 08:51:27.8140 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2465
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02SeUhUURTGu2+ZeU4O3CaXoyXVtECGSxYmZqYFNiCVUdAkhU550cFlZJ5J +pdiG07mWqNDLplSWqaI5NJANkjouIRIGgWJe5bZkIWKWz7fBP33O+f7zr3fPVyOVmSx7pw2 KYXokzQJSomMKVE3n/HaUxis9r3bHRjw8F2DNCCzcoINoVRVVYuUqtKywEZQkbKgGJKgTSV6 n+BoWVz7h8dMcpHbjXv502wGaods5MABPgy9Mx9RNpJxCvwSwYh1gBWLTgTDnaMbBYNzaKj8 UsGIiomCma/FtDCvwD0IZod8BJZgb8hv6mAFdsJq+NHWKRWYxnuhL3NsfZjjtmIeHn0moiUF yvtakchhYOgtZgULs27vn1QJbTmOhsnFLHugRgrmmlckguCAQyGvzrYxi7ALzFtfUOJVrvBp vJwSn4ahyvyeFtkZpsdWWdF/GdYMc6zY3w1NBT/tniAoNhjtfBqMK2/sfBYGrWUSIQTg+wxk PrdJRUEHBYWzSAgNOBDKeq7YPRR86823e7ZDS3cOEoXvLJgbxiXi4gg8rbuF8tAB03/BTetn 0Xg/1Lf5iO1dUGQYkZo2lrEFukrGmQrE1CJnnvBXE2P9/LyJXnuN53VJ3kkkpRGtf423TUu+ LWh6KtSCMIeUjnKb8ZhawWpS+bRECwKOVjrJTXnBaoU8RpOWTvS6KP31BMJb0DaOUbrK/WuG LypwrCaFxBOSTPT/VIpzcM9App1r+t+bz+9bbewbnDpabYogT7Jpc4bVqzZmwDExwPWPbnr0 Tlf1pH9465JVe2l+Mv3Zg5oT1bmbODIentVvLZWe6l5MnrDFe5wzGaPdOizLUWGhtXUXjkQu T5WHeBwy37w99JoMLLK/zPM7js8vLOcSz1fNQ7qTKpfShHpdp5Lh4zQHPWk9r/kLMbX0kxYD AAA=
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:53:01 -0000


I also want to see the suggested text before it is added as part of IETF last call (as indicated by Randall). Even if we don’t get the draft back to the WG, I want the WG to agree on the text.

I disagree that there is no technical issue here. "attach X to SIP message" can be understood in different ways, nearest one is to "include X with Content-Disposition: attachment in the SIP message" (which is likely not the intended meaning).

Kind regards


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Rosen [] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:28 PM
To: Christer Holmberg <>
Cc: Ivo Sedlacek <>om>;
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"

I object to your objection.

Despite your characterization, there is no technical issue here.  Everyone agrees on how the mechanism works.  There is an editorial issue on interpreting the word “attached”.  I don’t object to wordsmithing to make it more clear, but it’s not a technical problem and it can be dealt with any time before publication.


> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Christer Holmberg <> wrote:
> Hi,
> I also indicated (18th October) that I want to solve the issues before we move the draft forward. There have also been suggestions on how to solve issues. 
> Regards,
> Christer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ecrit [] On Behalf Of Ivo Sedlacek
> Sent: 28 November 2016 12:08
> To:
> Subject: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
> Hello,
> I noticed that WG state of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall changed to "Submitted to IESG for Publication" despite a comment (ISSUE 7 in the attached) raised during WGLC was not resolved, even though the issue was confirmed by other people and even though it was requested that the issue is solved before publication request.
> I am formally objecting to this state change.
> Kind regards
> Ivo Sedlacek
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list