Re: [Ecrit] Expert Reviewer's response to request to register 'country-specific' in 'sos' Subservice Registry in the Service URN Labels group

[Ivo Sedlacek <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

IMO, the proposed way of progress (a *draft* to create a sub registry for police) is not appropriate.

When an operator rolls out VoIP in a country which already provides an emergency service over circuit switched network, then the operator needs the emergency URNs for all emergency services (including all the various police emergency services) at VoIP *rollout*. This is needed (at least) for identification of a call as an emergency call in the operator's SIP network.

Waiting for a new RFC defining a sub registry for police would really mean that the operator needs to have some temporary emergency service URIs for the police emergency services, similarly as requested by 3GPP in the registration of the "country-specific" emergency service URN.

Moreover, the IANA response to 3GPP registration of the "country-specific" emergency service URN stated:
----------------------
> Since the management policy of the emergency service is “expert
> review”, the barrier to adding new, possibly experimental services is
> *low*, and the consequences of having services that are not eventually
> deployed persisting in the registry is minimal.
----------------------

Therefore, I decided to re-submit the IANA registration for the police emergency services in the Czech republic.

Kind regards

Ivo Sedlacek

From: Brian Rosen [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 1:47 AM
To: Ivo Sedlacek <[e-mail]>
Cc: Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Expert Reviewer's response to request to register 'country-specific' in 'sos' Subservice Registry in the Service URN Labels group

I am working on a draft to create a sub registry for police

It will include “national” and “municipal” as well as “provincial”,  “border”, “traffic”, “tourist” and “transport” with expert review to add others.

I may also include registrations for some of the other services listed in that article.

Brian
On Nov 18, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Ivo Sedlacek <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hello

> I'd suggest we just pick one name (e.g., either "state" or "province").  The IANA registration can say "Used for state-level or provincial level."  For the most part, users won't be entering or seeing these names anyway.

The original IANA registration (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/current/msg08419.html) was for two emergency emergency services existing in Czech republic:

Emergency-Service-1: emergency service offered by the police department or other law enforcement authorities of the local or municipal authorities.
Emergency-Service-2:-emergency service offered by the police department or other law enforcement authorities of the national government.

So two URNs are needed for Czech republic.

A lot of other emergency URNs will probably be needed for other countries - see last column inhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emergency_telephone_numbers

Kind regards

Ivo Sedlacek