IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Draft meeting minutes

"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 29 October 2019 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A681200F7 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuzeNefvnLXA for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5B812001E for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D45924CF95; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlzhzB4WBD3q; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D609924CF8C; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:29 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <1A969216-5D3D-4BDD-A754-81DFFFEE3E22@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <f20ef671-1e13-5dc7-4e7e-06eb40d77796@gmail.com>
References: <99234A93-2224-47F1-AA65-C71DC5DA3CD3@episteme.net> <f20ef671-1e13-5dc7-4e7e-06eb40d77796@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/8cO1a8B8RXCBT9uLmopu2OjLHe0>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Draft meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 21:53:34 -0000

On 29 Oct 2019, at 14:27, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 30-Oct-19 04:20, Pete Resnick wrote:
> ...
>> While the question was raised as to whether equity was a problem 
>> worth
>> solving, it did not appear to garner much support and appeared to be
>> squarely in the rough in the meeting.
>
> I had to read that twice to conclude that it means that the consensus
> was that equity is a problem worth solving.

Joel Halpern had the same problem, which tells me that it was a writing 
problem, not a reading problem. I'll clarify before finalizing.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick http://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email