IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Review of draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-06

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 29 October 2020 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB3C3A0C12 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZi7gcfOtScM for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EFA3A0C0F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id u62so4449044iod.8 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mYdOc8E9efa0waa66sFki9uScqyedk9EJ5mjByb9izM=; b=mn9cOd/n4qthQUq6ujvt6Gh/sH/WR8btJBRjdWj8ZjkgSzJLjTEaWcwJItp/OzpWee Gs+9cxq+AFALrv9XwoAz0ccpfNGZfcRibtFi3w2o+YOcim7yOJWb+MHwEC4T9/8QTXGl tv+tSBRSQFZPj4MKPM0GqTCuc1UJJUB8q/qhVwkSHUdGLMW+4DtJXcOco/6X7zbyEhwG 13lKCsZThwvx27y9kNVwnfsVLEo5HSC5kDzS4sz3qts4kHWKwJyY2wldtmZcogq+QIQb MFZ4kx/9upk3rL1uYbfZjv+MWwC7R8DLGVSxGsP8xKcXXHzfUCDYmXFSuG4ifsdmaFL8 JsSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mYdOc8E9efa0waa66sFki9uScqyedk9EJ5mjByb9izM=; b=MSo/8G2DxaPnrdKjmwDTrHeZ/TKS1RHo5oF/yVLw6mh8RjHhj82/5SnVxsPSipF2DY 9hri/85YG1QKZL3AUjMHMAbQIVLaFwnegvzRLco7p//68sqDqou2A62XE8JTydUBRUxD zprqL4Er5jPa1pY+u53mQWOMJrKQgDcieT4aSNvxUYZGKSw1yJjBqDpfo6H7kXz54Adx rp7JbfjJhSInWnf6VWkkvLYqCEeOW7II7Eql83cSf4GVny4HGrie/B37K5Smhu6Gbzdl ruAuj1RBOf66Tg0Q8pvZhfCqf28FFk/5YHHkVHFasQ4krpi8oCNXciP/dIk4UwZ7/rBD mjAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532V7erh6NW6HCu+PYu9NAeuEEPoed1kuRKd5OARz50vUqARRu97 pA6iUFg2jgb8Sev9/3BNjpvEZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWlcXc7XWRK4Yk+6Df1naUFHEOvHAXLVynBaXfCdr+mYYwUhyIne1H8VhGLq6zIyUuHMJw8Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9644:: with SMTP id d4mr4334016ios.199.1603993931775; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t16sm2833529ilh.76.2020.10.29.10.52.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <A1C2721C-8578-4431-8628-74EA396C003E@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4326E4B7-E38D-4959-9BAA-534F2E9FD8D0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.11\))
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:52:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJegOxuzNTeKmbHLfA+7komr2rwDnQzkqQXg_j8NYUg8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <CALaySJ+pWd7CCq5j7GLUxF-VOwAm4tx3OthE_gU9pUaMous7=g@mail.gmail.com> <f975ab5a-0f81-ac1f-9a60-36c54c606561@gmail.com> <15656.1603989780@localhost> <CALaySJJegOxuzNTeKmbHLfA+7komr2rwDnQzkqQXg_j8NYUg8Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/YuN3yykXRuxrupR4VyvAoLF1XXU>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Review of draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-06
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:52:14 -0000

On Oct 29, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> For me, it's not parity so much as what's a reasonable judgment of
> active participation.  Do we think that someone whose document went
> into the RFC Editor queue 5 years ago, and who has not been active
> since, is an active participant who should be NomCom eligible?  Do we
> think a working group chair who stepped down 3 years ago (or 5), and
> who has not been active since, is an active participant who should be
> NomCom eligible?

You could finesse this by adding the requirement that there be an RFC in the last five years and an I-D in the past, say, two years, but that might be more strict than is necessary.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email