IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 30 March 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF3E3A0BB0 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fp4km0P2YYHb for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E983B3A0BAE for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02UFM3SK008523; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:30:21 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=o9IFG2a888FC7VtmE6K3xkatvzggKjY8Yn+V7Es1rGA=; b=j6Lnuk5HsT3eRXU4pOCLBbMdEWG6sWedo/JKAbG7P5Ruw58cL1ycqq+PtJZvOKWXuGs0 HYP2IgNsEdhkyXVJUsz+/S38AzDyAEm09Sq6GwpWHF5cWXYjhB5mYeMC3UyQAbEM2y/t 95PCk6GnReUVJ7Es6D5ZkO/0xTyo8UTwQZMgIkYNVYwKlWnvNPePsc6C7PC2Nz9iFjlR RoEuMeaxM2NNOThCG3Kg+FjXZq8BkGP87+aX5VZS5zwVcVenOtwY1xqt8pBLCEzXuX7J D7ZSHiHmJnXxP6Ty+FnXBGMEoLwEB1pNcNc2FZsTHLHRSGYFaxXWv8yL9eg8jWBgl9jc Mw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 301xqbh1qt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:30:21 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02UFHSEa025807; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:30:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.115]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3028cx9brb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:30:16 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:30:11 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:30:10 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
CC: "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Index: AQHWBhkNTTN2cfa2y0W6IdYZ8tZl/ahgfAkAgADYvQA=
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:30:09 +0000
Message-ID: <008111D1-A0F7-4784-91BA-0FF824032893@akamai.com>
References: <28433.1585520758@localhost> <B74E3DFC-98FF-408A-8621-5847D77BFB7C@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <B74E3DFC-98FF-408A-8621-5847D77BFB7C@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_008111D1A0F7478491BA0FF824032893akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-30_06:2020-03-30, 2020-03-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=330 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003300143
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-30_06:2020-03-30, 2020-03-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=317 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003300143
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/snVGKJYEgCXBN1RnIXATRb60QR8>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom eligibility & IETF 107 (fwd) Scott Mansfield: RE: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:31:24 -0000

  *   The problem with “willingness to participate” as a sole criterion is that there are plenty of people who are willing to participate because they want to completely change the character of the IETF, rather than because they want to serve the IETF and make it more true to its aspirational goals.

How do you tell the difference?  For the most part, middle-aged American males got us here; do we want to continue that? How do we avoid the IETF equivalent of “regulatory capture” ?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email