IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66011200CC for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XaOx8jVqbt3h for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011DA120096 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 06:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.58] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED6721354; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 13:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1E90B8F-3AE7-4A9D-B1C7-0436FA0466BB@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 09:10:55 -0400
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3450B72-AD4E-471B-B21B-9DBCD330C204@deployingradius.com>
References: <D1E90B8F-3AE7-4A9D-B1C7-0436FA0466BB@ericsson.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/1Edne18CG2-hZRQX5cF8xT3SQ8w>
Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 13:11:03 -0000

On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> 
>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
> 
> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If we decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another draft, I think draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-07 is ready to move forward in the publication process.

  I agree.

  My one worry is that if we update EAP-TLS without also updating PEAP and TTLS, then bad things will happen.

  My $0.02 is to remove the discussion of FAST and TEAP from draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types, as the remaining items are not controversial.  The document should then be published simultaneously with the EAP-TLS updates.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email