IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 11 October 2019 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0224E120099; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wg4OuSPxgBqV; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872F112003F; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1427; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1570804492; x=1572014092; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=K+H55di/km1uLHsQHLFSoDKjR/VNZIDSCOtF4QOCrtc=; b=Yhus4HoopW6jDtge2thawwtxYhzGv0CWBnaCtYjbR1Q4V1gjDVj7jWJd IMtG7KJwi0Y4NpbdIaAY/4HlZS8oV88L1eUrI/nSGSmSNuW/2e9qig5J5 tqJzLr4JgtZq12EVGvZWXtjdMOvSQTBj8tpdpHuWr3BcWwmovGdMDd2z1 M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBAAD8kaBd/xTLJq1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgWoBAQEBAQELAYIfgT4BMiqTAIFqJZsmAgcBAQEJAwEBLwEBhEACgl4jNwYOAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FOYVLAQEBAwF5BQsLDgouVwYTgyIBglcgsTuCJ4VNhGcQgTQBgVKKOxiBf4E4DBOCTD6IBIIsBJYnlxyCLIIvgRORVxuCKgGLYoszpFGDEwIEBgUCFYFoI4FYMxoIGxVlAYJBPhIQFJAXPwMwkVEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,284,1566864000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="341729600"
Received: from aer-core-3.cisco.com ([173.38.203.20]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Oct 2019 14:34:50 +0000
Received: from [10.61.212.140] ([10.61.212.140]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9BEYiEO011383 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:34:49 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <DCC85780-B079-4AD0-8870-7528270B70D8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_94745580-D555-428D-A797-0B77F3D1F9F4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:34:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <9501.1570802988@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Cc: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, "draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13@ietf.org>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <7828_1564869242_5D46027A_7828_348_1_02e001d54a45$e92ae900$bb80bb00$@augustcellars.com> <20b118932a4843b6b88e605799fafea8@aalto.fi> <211AD83C-D111-4EEB-AAF0-D9B5E521F4CF@deployingradius.com> <8F355C6F-DF1E-4E03-B75E-0F1D2508B9D4@ericsson.com> <246280B8-6E5C-484B-95BD-9C940C98C507@deployingradius.com> <CY4PR1101MB22781AB8C8982ACF99B61544DB8E0@CY4PR1101MB2278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <17E08795-4E4E-4507-8384-836020966BCF@deployingradius.com> <634C375D-FBF3-4297-A5C0-E68C903CA34A@ericsson.com> <CAOgPGoBko6N_JebmisoSk_EJ=Hq21sV3xoXjLw4r7D+OFSsdZA@mail.gmail.com> <CC58A292-03D6-4D70-A11F-B8FEE7311E78@cisco.com> <26738.1570791861@dooku.sandelman.ca> <AD799A14-8268-4BAF-8925-3567973C7507@cisco.com> <9501.1570802988@dooku.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.212.140, [10.61.212.140]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/dxnrLYn-zPlwaXHcpOufu0dycgE>
Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:34:55 -0000


> On 11 Oct 2019, at 16:09, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> So, can wired just be a degenerate version of wifi, where there can be only
> one "ESSID", and there are no beacons to consider?


On the whole that has been my thought.  But it is a matter of which mechanism to degenerate to.  Is it TLS-PSK?  eDPP++?  TLS with naked public keys++?  And again, this is the on-prem case.  For cloud, we are well along.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email