Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B9F120889 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxWsx0tey1Fd for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F336120826 for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2028; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1570460142; x=1571669742; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=vF0UIC7I2erff03yGMALa830n1gM3ymB8IOEdPam9gE=; b=edN84aEkc3+QpLnT6Tk+/MlWgmdsybh7DAhWuZzWTi5S7l/S1GRhxV47 73PTF5gdylWdtlHwihr7KoKrVm/Rs7qgAL3SCAIYCxdo+PJf1OHHbyv5G oy//KQQ2Tx7g28iBK4QV3y5QYj38rDxPvaFtteza7QndByH65bS2uKb7d k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 484
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAAB/UJtd/xbLJq1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQwBAQEBAQGBVgEBAQEBAQsBg10gEiqNJYdJJZslAgcBAQEJAwEBLwEBhEACgn83Bg4CAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYU5hUsBAQEDAXkFCwsYLlcGE4MiAYF7D61/gieFTYRoEIE0AYFSilOBf4ERJwwTgkw+gmEEhR6CJgSWI5cZgiyCMIETkVUbgjqLU4syj2uUYYMSAgQGBQIVgWgjgVgzGggbFWUBgkE+EhAUkBc/AzABAZFqAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,268,1566864000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="17720458"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 07 Oct 2019 14:55:40 +0000
Received: from [10.61.253.33] ([10.61.253.33]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x97Etdl7030915 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 14:55:40 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <93830D3A-59C4-4860-BBD2-B2019BB30671@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_67260042-D1A4-414F-A6EE-40C4BC793ABC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:55:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A3450B72-AD4E-471B-B21B-9DBCD330C204@deployingradius.com>
Cc: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
References: <D1E90B8F-3AE7-4A9D-B1C7-0436FA0466BB@ericsson.com> <A3450B72-AD4E-471B-B21B-9DBCD330C204@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.253.33, [10.61.253.33]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/1vH71Um-ULvNMHkW2FBprwuc9hI>
Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 14:55:45 -0000


> On 7 Oct 2019, at 15:10, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
> 
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
>> 
>> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If we decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another draft, I think draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-07 is ready to move forward in the publication process.
> 
>  I agree.
> 
>  My one worry is that if we update EAP-TLS without also updating PEAP and TTLS, then bad things will happen.
> 
>  My $0.02 is to remove the discussion of FAST and TEAP from draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types, as the remaining items are not controversial.  The document should then be published simultaneously with the EAP-TLS updates.


If we evolve draft-lear-eap-teap-brski into a more generic TEAP update we could cover TLS 1.3 there.

Eliot