Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Thu, 31 October 2019 04:39 UTC
Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AEB1200B2 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xAbslTWz7DsD for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3B6120074 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id z17so6773997qts.9 for <emu@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MWWc/Z7FHfjIo1baR2vQYS/JYWyALGyEXaUGVOUnAOU=; b=Z6nJMicNaE+nf3muCpMSnGD3jkwQxBiDHbwpaDYNL9X4vXhS6Y2uUv1qdmNke1jF9f 5tA+aZPV7NJPgycRl/NL/lafK16iKz+zY0qLvKn0aM0WZfwubK5qfJ+Y2CEz+/czg81q gZf5xVT0V3mLlT+ftud3NGjXWjfo3urjsUfu5kYxFY1ntJfA5tTB+/kEDSQuLu19uz/Q KKrxT+oKQphBFMc4cK+tAWaZX7F05mQ2Nv5uqYM9eHTIe99WV0Jkr2wlf1BEgysE6XS/ KTEU7JTj7FMv7PnqCq/WTTug/4meoN5FhOs8sh8qdBBy4G8Pw+98UeygVw5ueAiJHrpi JqJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MWWc/Z7FHfjIo1baR2vQYS/JYWyALGyEXaUGVOUnAOU=; b=BaNqumaGie4kMAqdXqlSe8hQUb/8KoV9ssZFJMEIgub6nytCdgxcWkDKYZin2tczil Y2e7ok9zXZJFAZfrCahGwPSVedgqp4CTI3k3rk014pautj/dCyjnBhl4zeMIdKOTqsRO iwvwA78OsFzXlnVzh6Get1UE5CDqqy3WTxjLEuKD0Q6lNK9t+WVni11yhBYe0/UnpvW/ Zb15VXw5+m9oowc89JgBglRaJ49yveEOySo12Fgqo+TUdHA3+k6lEOYHO99Xap6bsZ/M 6BrPO9azD3eIy+s7p6+gMdq4q73ML53+NlN4u3yygmVAEZWXjajPhlDWOX2+3qxxik7J BvvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgk5q2k8kaT9kcMDbjIpgQR2p+yHHxi0TIp6YmS3NXydAYXc+h oJsgVi36gWZUHOWFcBJH0GQt2LWqKN0L40SSDfbI/iEt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytnc2pIb5C0lYIfO8McSBcJj6GnI53G+ZIJUNdjM0Z8UPsTnBXhIIbqC2VuFxoXqGomCjWlv/yFjTmNpG2n3o=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b59b:: with SMTP id g27mr2817731qve.184.1572496790889; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7828_1564869242_5D46027A_7828_348_1_02e001d54a45$e92ae900$bb80bb00$@augustcellars.com> <20b118932a4843b6b88e605799fafea8@aalto.fi> <211AD83C-D111-4EEB-AAF0-D9B5E521F4CF@deployingradius.com> <8F355C6F-DF1E-4E03-B75E-0F1D2508B9D4@ericsson.com> <246280B8-6E5C-484B-95BD-9C940C98C507@deployingradius.com> <CY4PR1101MB22781AB8C8982ACF99B61544DB8E0@CY4PR1101MB2278.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <17E08795-4E4E-4507-8384-836020966BCF@deployingradius.com> <634C375D-FBF3-4297-A5C0-E68C903CA34A@ericsson.com> <CAOgPGoBko6N_JebmisoSk_EJ=Hq21sV3xoXjLw4r7D+OFSsdZA@mail.gmail.com> <CC58A292-03D6-4D70-A11F-B8FEE7311E78@cisco.com> <26738.1570791861@dooku.sandelman.ca> <AD799A14-8268-4BAF-8925-3567973C7507@cisco.com> <9501.1570802988@dooku.sandelman.ca> <DCC85780-B079-4AD0-8870-7528270B70D8@cisco.com> <CAOgPGoA0RCY+J5bDOyUiKtFy5Vk=C11yvE8O=rsJPQeS8Fzk0A@mail.gmail.com> <B31BF8C4-6568-49F2-BBD1-BD6AC66D393C@cisco.com> <20826A11-1881-40F9-8C54-82BB90820851@deployingradius.com> <CY4PR2101MB0868995B202E4E94470B76EAD1630@CY4PR2101MB0868.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR2101MB0868995B202E4E94470B76EAD1630@CY4PR2101MB0868.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 21:39:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoBP0hJ7KhzFuzE5_2Uw-T+7utLvqAbFRgAB7dCwZ4sOUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jorge Vergara <jovergar=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>, "draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13@ietf.org>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1b9b205962d70c7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/LkrPEdJcpO3CQLqJiaXYFjyyy6M>
Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 04:39:55 -0000
Hi Jorge, Thanks for joining the conversation. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:11 PM Jorge Vergara <jovergar= 40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hello - I am the primary maintainer of Microsoft's EAP implementation. I > am sorry for joining late to this conversation, but hope our input is > welcome. > > On the topic of draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types: > > I agree that it is necessary to standardize other TLS based EAP methods at > the same time as EAP-TLS. The alternatives if this doesn't happen were > discussed here previously at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/J9Afcza1gOBQ_jww8E0yxSKPYeo - > namely, either implementations will forge ahead with non-standard updates > anyways, or they will be forced to wait to update EAP-TLS until the other > methods are updated. > > We are taking the second approach - we do not plan to update our EAP-TLS > implementation until it is clear what the updates to other EAP methods will > look like. We do not want to see non-standard vendor implementations to > become difficult to implement de-facto standards. We would also like to see > TEAP covered in this update. > > A brief review on the material contained in the > draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types: > > I believe the 0x00 "Commitment message" not to send anymore TLS handshake > data should be mentioned in this document, since it was established during > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/0MeocWZQLCv1pST5_2jW_ABlpMo > that even tunnel based methods will need this. > > The key derivation proposed for TEAP/FAST uses the definition from FAST, > which is not identical to the TEAP derivation. Namely, FAST used MSK[j] in > the derivation, but TEAP uses IMSK[j], which may be equivalent in some > cases, but may not in others where the inner method exports an EMSK. I > understand there may be a TEAP errata related to this and I may not be > fully up to date on the errata discussion, so perhaps this is already taken > into consideration. > > [Joe] I know that Alan has been asking for help with this draft especially with TEAP and EAP-FAST. I hope that you and others can work with him to get the draft in a shape that we can progress through the working group. I agree that this is an important thing to do. The EAP-TLS 1.3 draft is fairly far along and I do not think we have consensus to add TEAP into the document at this point, but I think we can make faster progress on the TLS types document if we have people interested in working on it. > Jorge Vergara > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emu <emu-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 4:12 AM > To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> > Cc: draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13@ietf.org; John Mattsson <john.mattsson= > 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>; > EMU WG <emu@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13 > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 5:02 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > > A fair argument, if it can be made, and I am not convinced it has been > fully expressed, is the idea that there is no context by which one can > separate fast restart and initial authentication. This is Alan’s concern. > I’m not saying it’s without merit, but what I cannot yet see is whether it > is an implementation or a protocol matter. > > I believe it's a protocol matter. In TLS 1.3, PSK handshakes are the > same as resumption handshakes. > > It's not clear to me how this issue was addressed when using TLS 1.3 > with HTTPS. But I do believe it's an issue there, too. > > As an additional note, I believe it's also important that > draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types be published at the same time as the EAP-TLS > document. The only unknown there is FAST and TEAP. I'm happy to remove > them from the document. > > But at this point it's not even a WG document. There's not even > consensus that the document necessary, which surprises me rather a lot. > Because password-based EAP methods are *much* more wide-spread than EAP-TLS. > > If the IETF publishes EAP-TLS without simultaneously rev'ing TTLS and > PEAP, it will not only look bad, it will *be* bad. And the industry press > will (rightfully) lambast the standards process. > > Alan DeKok. > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Femu&data=02%7C01%7Cjovergar%40microsoft.com%7C68e3a65a1c3441c857cb08d75d2a038b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637080308161040037&sdata=zrPr0rRh1bkV8rrF23SaAJYz6aFfuO3lTX9e6U1fOXw%3D&reserved=0 > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
- [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13 Jim Schaad
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Aura Tuomas
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… John Mattsson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Jorge Vergara
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Owen Friel (ofriel)
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Emu] POST WGLC Comments draft-ietf-emu-eap-t… Joseph Salowey