Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Sun, 14 September 2014 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A751A02DA for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWuc10Vod-WV for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C2C1A017D for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k15so2509296qaq.5 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=u8lRB3YSrEYp3jMq9+UlNdmNUlqt70GEqxXcqYzVCAY=; b=YqyoXbs7GO/P9Fwu3f0NpDI9B4yGZzRgK2FYgAryQiXyyb22SmRkIDOV1vwdhKpBzK fygV0EU+YjIuH10MNt03Z5mowkCJ3U1cive1V2zIkSAU9Rt/kYaBklDedVdtpnc86CSK Z4mm/1PCQV8RRlfYfxaRv8nTpr2+DCjw2XkMmqGeq0dYXT5W3wmSRRW41rT26X/Scqps a9cQlrUjz/KWQEADKzAamtGXm3Ht1IPiqo11e3RFIZra42oxBThXHuNxxwO72qzfgfqx UpB4G6J+e9V5FZZchuJKGgYwMbWGadlGUKvmkKHzIpEmrF/g/Oezhoz6kAmX0YmRyfqs vxmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=u8lRB3YSrEYp3jMq9+UlNdmNUlqt70GEqxXcqYzVCAY=; b=Hd5gIDChbYLlF2i5AKBKdKG5H9N96g/d/OgnEQi5xh+hwnwor5W+4DhpZpoL3oTXMH 1/tf4vd3SCGKHla+umUXVIx1oOzQHne6GLb99phZh0DQnv1wLYz4Eabl/N6+W8QFPqKK ebYSIs9Zkbrxr8SZ68Gz9ZOjI82pOPn+/zqalNpJfjLznxuSDI5pnp2OPwgr5Aqzejg6 rZtq1RmoFcqbmUhMongzjK2Kqf2sC9sxYFgL+3bprWNTJujPfkQhcqJd5wITVunyd9lB ns01OAxqZVBK+Mv8+PK+YSjDRrmuhm+JmtVE3OH06NvI6KPQuHpjV2OLyNQNQlffADM4 7+NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUOHlaoN7mhZoC317PATLdSrRLuNDFFRWcD+XYRb+o8Dv4rIhZNUJlbEAb2tYJwpXh14ye
X-Received: by 10.140.38.231 with SMTP id t94mr7571973qgt.3.1410682407963; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.116.71 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87sijvmmo5.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <CAAFsWK0VtnVvKwvkC1kjK+yKORkADVW1cKDx7nQ1fxA=dpZeTQ@mail.gmail.com> <87sijvmmo5.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK35dsKAzQaePRcYT8Nd+PD1w3AGf58S=-9u5AjcXgNhQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c13ed0d1941b0503021742"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/9r7Kpm9TyCjQ9-BQziNYmbBTHAQ
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 08:13:31 -0000

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:48, weihaw@google.com said:
>
> > 1) S/MIME doesn't fully protect users mail envelope metadata.  For
> example
> > the recipient and envelope-sender must be visible to the intermediate
> SMTP
>
> If you want that, it is easy to put the messaqge into a message/rfc822
> mail container and use faked subject and other mailer header.
>

Right I agree that there is a RFC5751 sec 3.1 (
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5751#page-18 ) that mentions the
message/rfc822, but unless I'm missing something one still has to specify
the intended recipient, and a return path.  Even if the body and most
headers were wrapped hence private, an adversary could still find the
sender/recipient information very useful.

Another issue albeit a small one with message/rfc822, was what to do if the
headers conflicted between the outer and inner messages.

-Wei


>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
>    Werner
>
> --
> Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
>
>