[Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 12 September 2014 18:14 UTC
Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A321A8710 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRlCVuBjO5h8 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A048A1A7D81 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3F4FA0081; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1410545550-20915-20914/12/155; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:12:30 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: endymail@ietf.org, Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Message-Id: <3f5714b98514a5fc21cf872c798bc3445317968b88bf5ebac39505df09b11475.sha-256@android.antelope.email>
References: <CAAFsWK0VtnVvKwvkC1kjK+yKORkADVW1cKDx7nQ1fxA=dpZeTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:12:30 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/FJ21_j4fRf4Q_cXpwZZJ5_bVvgE
Subject: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:14:05 -0000
Just a question... I heard someone say at one IETF conference that S/MIME is the only standard with more implementations than users. Why has it suffered that fate? Surely not because of the two problems you mention. Arnt
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Tom Mitchell
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang