Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 18:51 UTC
Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFD01A06FC for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id om1uiAbp0jS8 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF62D1A0011 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e89so1204065qgf.10 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hdK6Xw3SYWq4mog05mDkRpuUGFcs63u20baJC5LDhK4=; b=BWTC3dLSgkoBRjeHsggzeHMwDlJJyVKUbxCLR0sayLFq9VLBxYA0Fk+Z1IVMAgs93b S/lLTbwWZub/rEMpSQrd/pY5aSwM5+4OC5oCVxIT0kSnh7jdiCP4zZ4mt/+lgGGEn1jN 3LSTl9Jyz3Y0KL5HYQMxe1B3usx7Bk6tJmwtQBX9e+Jji4OxPx/QGfvRzhVZW0M6yeDJ XEM+O2DJwX9IsUHL/SKHOtmVbHFEMYmTueujdKkk9+tmk5VuhMp7UPPdon/bzVjiTJvK XB2gUBd1/jb1DRwKNOwpK4/VAokYW5g7/Hc7KJYblUjsYrrb4W/uWws2PstTCmKDrdnn U/Hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=hdK6Xw3SYWq4mog05mDkRpuUGFcs63u20baJC5LDhK4=; b=GspAglCf+er7Y+CHhooHyK1OVUbhOQj2+oOFy/fjFQbIdJEqUSRVkv6NTnYVsnDkyH +X5s6usEKGaFNRL455TkbKs2JNzeC30bBSbySTGdg41nWgDxpLYZApai9x7LI8YqD3RY CCuLowV2E1IoHocFhX8FchxZxcy4VYDwlu/VjbfMjd2D119zl487WTUSsRd4VHeUXfaV IBq6KY8LvT+tOKnYWwI6/qQBntGG+2ay0ROkN+S/d6jgruyMAT/ExodsjleS7RigkCf4 0wX8MFFQrFa00IcSVDhkNvIglK2rLTMijJNIT0WGlWTl8zcB09T3xzpU2ZzSnR0kYd+M mSsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknzlrL1ztMsNUYehk0yLR//xzePg/pULQ2b/RguwkP5/xBxXHnPKSUnU9x8mfbQuhFuus4
X-Received: by 10.140.101.118 with SMTP id t109mr15375556qge.101.1410547914444; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.116.71 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3f5714b98514a5fc21cf872c798bc3445317968b88bf5ebac39505df09b11475.sha-256@android.antelope.email>
References: <CAAFsWK0VtnVvKwvkC1kjK+yKORkADVW1cKDx7nQ1fxA=dpZeTQ@mail.gmail.com> <3f5714b98514a5fc21cf872c798bc3445317968b88bf5ebac39505df09b11475.sha-256@android.antelope.email>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:51:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK1-+YqOZiLmFKS874JqGUepR9=3onrHJ9tpNDqo0AkM4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c16afc6143cb0502e2c7cc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/CyykgHLJD1X1lOLCNjJAxwl17dw
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:51:58 -0000
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no > wrote: > Just a question... I heard someone say at one IETF conference that S/MIME > is the only standard with more implementations than users. Why has it > suffered that fate? Surely not because of the two problems you mention. My two problems relate to privacy problems I see with S/MIME. More to your point, if you can make concrete the issues that cause lack of S/MIME usage, those can be added to the list and the community will prioritize the list by importance. -Wei > > Arnt >
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Tom Mitchell
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang