Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9361A7035 for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jnr4ILZOjReS for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82841A7028 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so1233597qgd.35 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qg3z7/Ydapax9VKcvZQuU9GxTTO4PeOapcSW0+oiBpU=; b=n0QlmhKLG9YBPwTBQSAk20VyGwKJG5yk9HFrxOpIY1UkkYARryNmcfwzAUi0slcnTX A2QPhzdfZ1k/63HdjP0LNunF+vSsW1fx4hnWGdRJwFpITdYvHRhOJoKYgHNhvbqClajD m1n2PA/v8m1IfPEgPaMM+yXIZVRLDQZGd/yga0s8EJIUBJUhmO2nZ+tVYL0Z3HLOcfRY vJTqspvRWg9m2ZyKYPmZZVusMWe3YjkLyHOdVVqMInpiDafD/ILdlS9ZIUB0LYR6LCFT BamZqZBVE+vcAvrZovBid+V44ps6m0Vxgm83FOmw3Egbb/tBiym9gaWfAJ22SVIM+57X 6fJQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.104.1 with SMTP id m1mr14893042qao.81.1410547156070; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.218.8.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f91sm3554253qgf.6.2014.09.12.11.39.14 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54133D0A.10603@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:35:54 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <CAAFsWK0VtnVvKwvkC1kjK+yKORkADVW1cKDx7nQ1fxA=dpZeTQ@mail.gmail.com> <3f5714b98514a5fc21cf872c798bc3445317968b88bf5ebac39505df09b11475.sha-256@android.antelope.email>
In-Reply-To: <3f5714b98514a5fc21cf872c798bc3445317968b88bf5ebac39505df09b11475.sha-256@android.antelope.email>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/Zz9gHrjtFcFsrM6I8qrFRsTrV2k
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:39:20 -0000
On 9/12/2014 11:12 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Just a question... I heard someone say at one IETF conference that > S/MIME is the only standard with more implementations than users. Why > has it suffered that fate? Surely not because of the two problems you > mention. Generic discussions about challenges in gaining use of end2end security at Internet scale seem to be applicable to S/Mime. They note: 1. We don't have an existence proof for workable key management at scale. 2. We don't have an existence proof for usability (UX, HCI, etc.) at Internet scale, which means workable for non-geeks who have no extra motivation. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Dave Crocker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Werner Koch
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Tom Mitchell
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang
- Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME Wei Chuang