Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Sun, 14 September 2014 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: endymail@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA0B1A02FF for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 02:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lsezh3ygMDIS for <endymail@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 02:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [217.69.77.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1B61A02F7 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 02:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1XT5lh-0002kw-81 for <endymail@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:06:49 +0200
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.82 #3 (Debian)) id 1XT5ht-00040A-0O; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:02:53 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
References: <CAAFsWK0VtnVvKwvkC1kjK+yKORkADVW1cKDx7nQ1fxA=dpZeTQ@mail.gmail.com> <87sijvmmo5.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <CAAFsWK35dsKAzQaePRcYT8Nd+PD1w3AGf58S=-9u5AjcXgNhQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: id=1E42B367; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:02:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAAFsWK35dsKAzQaePRcYT8Nd+PD1w3AGf58S=-9u5AjcXgNhQQ@mail.gmail.com> (Wei Chuang's message of "Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:13:07 -0700")
Message-ID: <87bnqimv5v.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/endymail/l07NqrZYUrAOOSpxFAGvhiKX1t8
Cc: endymail@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Endymail] Improvements to S/MIME
X-BeenThere: endymail@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <endymail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/>
List-Post: <mailto:endymail@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail>, <mailto:endymail-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:06:53 -0000

On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:13, weihaw@google.com said:

> Right I agree that there is a RFC5751 sec 3.1 (
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5751#page-18 ) that mentions the
> message/rfc822, but unless I'm missing something one still has to specify
> the intended recipient, and a return path.  Even if the body and most

Mixmaster does this for ages.  Mutt has support for Mixmaster for more
than 15 years.  Changing this to work at all levels using MIME
containers won't be too hard.  For stronger anonymity the MTAs may use
TOR or similar.  Agreed, this is not a problem of standards but of doing
the work.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.