IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Entmib] Entity MIB v3

Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com> Thu, 04 November 2004 19:44 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA26417 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:44:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CPnQl-0005Ck-9J; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:37:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CPnO5-0004c3-C8 for entmib@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:35:13 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25429 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:35:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPnde-0004pS-Og for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:51:20 -0500
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2004 11:47:31 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com [171.71.163.17]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iA4JYYnC001501 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abierman-xp.cisco.com (sjc-vpn4-40.cisco.com [10.21.80.40]) by mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BAS90479; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20041104112435.02e10e70@fedex.cisco.com>
X-Sender: abierman@fedex.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:34:33 -0800
To: entmib@ietf.org
From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Subject: [Entmib] Entity MIB v3
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: entmib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

It doesn't make sense to me to undo one deprecated table
but not the other one.  The entLPMappingTable was deprecated 
so we could advance to Draft Standard.  Since we are cycling 
at Proposed instead of advancing to Draft, there is no reason 
to deprecate this table.

I will post an update (w/o the IPR goof) after the IETF. 
I would like to un-deprecate the entLPMappingTable as well.

Also, I need examples for the entPhysicalUris object.
This object is too vague for me to provide any examples.
I also see no guidance for which types of physical
entities should provide a mfg date.  FRUs only?
More text is needed for both of these new objects.

thanks,
Andy


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email