IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Entmib] #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

"David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com> Thu, 25 March 2004 16:20 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04703 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6XaL-00086U-Jc; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:20:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6Xa6-00085Q-1W for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:19:46 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04609 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:19:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6Xa2-0004Uw-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:19:42 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6XYv-0004Rn-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:18:33 -0500
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net ([209.128.82.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6XYS-0004OY-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:18:04 -0500
Received: from NB5.dsperkins.com (shell4.bayarea.net [209.128.82.1]) by shell4.bayarea.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2PGHwb18879; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:17:58 -0800
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040325081635.02334c78@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: dperkins@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:17:47 -0800
To: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>, entmib@ietf.org
From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Subject: Re: [Entmib] #322 - Textual Convention Names (Prefix)
In-Reply-To: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A9D2FEB@zcard0ka.ca.norte l.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

HI,

Tell me again why a prefix of "EntityPhys" doesn't work?

At 11:03 AM 3/25/2004 -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>hi
>
>Ok, so what would be the proper prefix? I think we have ruled out 'Entity'
>and 'ITU'. 
>
>There have been some suggestions about creating a new MIB module to house
>the TCs. I've personally seen a lot of interest in using the TCs, so I think
>it would be worth the effort. Of course if we deviate too far away from the
>well-deployed OSI model, there may be less demand, but it is probably still
>worth doing.
>
>Sharon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 10:34 AM
>To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]; entmib@ietf.org
>Subject: RE: [Entmib] Entity comments
>
>
>In hindsight (after having seen discussion over the last 2 days) and based
>on:
><clip>
>> 
>It seems that a ITU is NOT the proper prefix.
>But some prefix does make sense.
>
>Bert
Regards,
/david t. perkins 


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email