Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

Rik Ribbers <> Tue, 26 January 2016 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5961A6FDE for <>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:00:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.094
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6NkadjydGHar for <>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430A81A0116 for <>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:00:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt;; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=P73oAKA/jGiEs6OmAIM39WHYTdDuMggvDfsbgyxst/Y=; b=ylomptN2/B/IDR3OF5dyJ70JuwA61GGJ8aw4LfI8vSmN3H8D2ZYhZwi+sg6NK+JYe/qjzyDqanuSqzDDZtvpr7QYNu92bzqES09QjdxNgd2iYm++YMoGPB4AJa41v/0yWBG+AScNN6pScl7MEijzQ6pfVz9je+2CrHKhi9ZHT+Hk2wWrwOBADGdZH9ERykOlweAX8n524YlPYZG6zXEkYejgarO2wiESIoL6mEor1NKAsIrZRoKGcCBvZPtzDFRdwKqP1q6ttKVUbtjr4LU8D9ngEk2vv8fK3rcfGJQUw+NuUS60P/BUS3unpAksAtzSaWrDN6sqWVdCs1QwKLB07g==
Received: from ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ([]) by with ESMTP id u0Q808DB030731-u0Q808DD030731 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:00:08 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ( by ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:00:09 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ([fe80::e051:e184:7a9f:b09d]) by ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ([fe80::e051:e184:7a9f:b09d%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:00:09 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <>
To: James Galvin <>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter
Thread-Index: AQHRVVl7VgMlDoy8j0G7wEz26UXISp8NY62A
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:00:09 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7211FE165784CD68EFC3ACE196B3AE6sidnnl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: eppext <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:00:14 -0000

I have no objection to adding the wording from Marc Blanchet to the charter.

However as time has passed a new draft has surfaced(draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date)  Should we add this to the milestone list or not?

I prefer not to add them and do a call for adoption when we finally have the new charter in place (as we can do this based on our new charter).

One side question:

Will we alias the mailinglists (eppext, provreg weirds) into a new one as discussed here:

Shouldn’t this be in the charter somewhere or is this just something operational when the new charter is approved? Again I hope for the last as I do not want to delay the rechartering process.


On 22 Jan 2016, at 22:11, James Galvin <<>> wrote:

Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.

There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on the charter before committing it to the IESG.

Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:

There was no response to this message on the list.

Marc first made the suggestion here:

As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this short thread:

Would working group members please indicate their support or objection for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two sentence change to the charter if folks want to remove it.

EppExt mailing list