Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

"James Galvin" <> Fri, 29 January 2016 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561181A8AF6 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRWs63MrfYy0 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 681731AC3E4 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id o6so29227872qkc.2 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gUPsIEFnE7cMkUFJlj3Hi0Rh9gebq8tObeF2Ivwvxvs=; b=KiAfMqtdyYk3ig8jHWZU4Nz//es5oSYoSHrNBqOqZldFlKJ8Mh0Mo9XrrNJsSTOSwF DSzGlg6uwTEbTrNWlofaMwsZKrF5PD9glsh6Ej3ND5Hj/QaPe57LXB7xAzIq8YDXyh/9 6e252RQI+Fth6e0vUo87Y0uTOp2cwZ7Qn+URMT+KrJdbFsBLgvHTmv39JW6RazACdJWJ +LIfqMLc0IYPoOrhOxiYeSj18Q71kTxPd0wvvF58PafRBgyk8isY/J5M5yfVtUlEc2k1 vpnMyIVh9ED0+0i2iOHCNn9dUCHexg551nYm/RHzeKQF/4VKQu1KXucsVTSq9/dsmiYm g/AA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gUPsIEFnE7cMkUFJlj3Hi0Rh9gebq8tObeF2Ivwvxvs=; b=XSCk3UJLpRQRb4SEZJ57Eb/kU54ruZg2j7vxvfxoX3ZJjN28tS5n1e7XlvoSN6W2/T MqLzqZGIIAbHhx4PTgsDaxlMS7w+ucOCtn62xKX3fm1ErQVJ1UASaF4TxUirRzb0B4vB aTpLckHcb2GoUWfLqLGikRKP3kWmJVd2cVNpDHOlSeMmNkybGo9d+xFjX5T1TwmeFVbN aELnKCANu4cCZafYsPwk2p8qCWi43E6Tgqh+tpf2JwGPzKwk5t+fYbjVWcHAlmMzIY1E Vte0vz0TBHdACLh5uQZJIDFZsJLM/u+wXBupkY+9WST60/nMnXbX7sZVIzUGDtia13gw +sxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQoLbqiVnDLhiXW52yBXiV4iT42/fo7U182tSGwbfuHmjQvAkSH6aZBCTeLUg+LPA==
X-Received: by with SMTP id w82mr13437042qka.52.1454099913578; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id r7sm5879083qkl.32.2016. for <> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:38:32 -0800 (PST)
From: James Galvin <>
To: eppext <>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:38:31 -0500
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_85AD16DB-95AC-4418-B686-73900479E27C_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:38:46 -0000

So far those that have commented have all supported the charter as 

Gustavo made a suggestion for an additional milestone but that has not 
received much support.  The proposal in this case is to focus on getting 
the charter updated and then we can update the milestones later if that 
is appropriate.  It is also worth mentioned that there is some 
discussion about Gustavo’s document progressing on ICANN’s gtld-tech 
list and I don’t think we should interrupt that just yet.

We did say that today would be the last day for comments.  I didn’t 
indicate a time so we’ll go with close of business everywhere.  Barry 
is already aware of this and I’ll send him an “official” note 
tomorrow morning that the charter is ready to go.

The question of what will happen to the mailing lists has been asked by 
a few people.  When we formally submit the charter and it is approved 
then Barry will make the appropriate requests for the following to 

1. The regext list will be created.
2. Subscribers of all of “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” 
will be subscribed to regext.
3. The lists “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” will be 
aliased to point to “regext”.

All of this should just happen and we should all just take note when it 
does and then start using the appropriate alias for sending messages to 
the list.

If there are any other questions or concerns please do speak up.



On 22 Jan 2016, at 16:11, James Galvin wrote:

> Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all 
> changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.
> There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the 
> list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want 
> to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on 
> the charter before committing it to the IESG.
> Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:
> There was no response to this message on the list.
> Marc first made the suggestion here:
> As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour 
> asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this 
> short thread:
> Would working group members please indicate their support or objection 
> for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two sentence 
> change to the charter if folks want to remove it.
> Jim