IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Sieve REJECT and :fcc [was Re: Meeting minutes and notes from today]

Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net> Fri, 05 January 2018 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4D81241F8 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:40:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=rbMrYcuB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=hg6DCVn+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0skUD-LkjNPb for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64D681201F8 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6416E20A81 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 20:40:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jan 2018 20:40:44 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Uo83RVtk4+WtsQnjHRkwV+6wZ+eK0 uEoTMxIPP41Ckg=; b=rbMrYcuBoGEVTD+U2LAYoUEFhwDWsimlJFqc7Q2oGEqzI haZzguCn6wYPgT4BDBYq0jTXSrwBg3v8QmCzPvpJE/g5JGQXEabQLadgOGw6qTIu EePM1eAg9/YCihNFP+ecCVnetAOtNe6f/cQgO6wxBEXJMNmMEqVESPQ/dYWh89WV Ue7IKAX316VMCKSXoX3zwGtdf2EryKWbZMJ/m8vxx8+PlxZvMEYQy6nRF7pEXXlc WyZIYBATTqzXV3p+joVe8VAMHILLbvXZm/Z2CW+f6N6lJI6g4MfoMqVGee7TPtDy ckSPbp9ET5NAoyjQBJ4r4uUiFvACFLFlj4BYRz1SQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Uo83RV tk4+WtsQnjHRkwV+6wZ+eK0uEoTMxIPP41Ckg=; b=hg6DCVn+/MZYEpfJFOC5qe rZVHFz5/Ohhcgbmt3gQdYhyzWqCxYBjv4B4LEIW4gWClueD9WAci7CQxDV0Hnf5L S5Otg0TspKKz/TYlD8kZB/7dhtm++Icbifdt8xWkNShnAtUKJMQaKD0bADPKiiF9 tClTcDHLbphr9SX2xAz7d3OGzpYHXqUBc4x8iSydM/qBgzvUhSJMY6tdEBxg0sav tBpJE1YgO+Ia1slOcF0lsRj21QYKd4BrTDsL51FCJJjKIeS8IRQnJSW1kcc56k9s P/kqr63gn4EjYBRnQbTi4AgLDR/omoqBtfy1OPSUBBc2Q6DYUSCYRqmJjsBN5t2A ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:nNdOWny7vG8_1y6wa59mhOcKX3XcQsaTnIqwBa8vXjalFr9Kr0fg_Q>
Received: from [192.168.1.71] (108-84-31-27.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net [108.84.31.27]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 08E7A7E34D for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 20:40:44 -0500 (EST)
References: <1510734636.1704307.1173072248.27572238@webmail.messagingengine.com> <C0D8D552-4B1C-49D9-8CCC-E6F57F225C1A@glyphein.mailforce.net> <1515028094.3135331.1223576440.053F86DC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01QNFXVO7LVS000051@mauve.mrochek.com> <BE46D703-89FF-4250-BFF8-EB194729D4CF@glyphein.mailforce.net> <4ae4f1d5-bf40-483a-ae88-befe01d3adef@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <7C65B98D-6755-4957-A181-CBA08354D11B@glyphein.mailforce.net> <1515109224.681625.1224717176.520E1500@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Stan Kalisch <stan@glyphein.mailforce.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-127FEBC4-505C-4265-B5FA-4D4EE5C58C0D"
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <1515109224.681625.1224717176.520E1500@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-Id: <2520156B-CD12-4204-9940-A003CDBB686B@glyphein.mailforce.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 20:40:41 -0500
To: extra@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/2-Yxad4ywcUW-5qYl1wEnsYR_cU>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Sieve REJECT and :fcc [was Re: Meeting minutes and notes from today]
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 01:40:47 -0000

> On Jan 4, 2018, at 6:40 PM, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote:
> 
> Is everybody OK with having fcc not include reject, and having a separate capability (fcc-reject or similar) which administrators can decide whether or not to allow - and indeed, software implementations the choice whether or not to implement.
> 
> That fixes both issues - those who really want the ability to lie can do so, but it's clear that they're enabling that facility, and it's also possible for both software vendors and administrators to not provide the facility in the first place.

I personally think it should be up to administrators only, but I recognize that's an ugly hack to the spec already in place.  So I'm okay with it.


Thanks,
Stan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email