Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship

Yes, Jamal, Thanks, and
Happy New Year to Everyone.

This item (item #9) deals with my question
on OF during IETF85 in Atlanta, GA (
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/minutes/minutes-85-forces), and I
support a, b, and c. Thanks.

Best.

Bhumip

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> wrote:

> [I know it is still slow week - but we gotta complete going
> over these suggested work items]
>
> What it is
> ----------
> Illustration of OpenFlow to ForCES relationship.
> Refer to:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow-lib/
>
> Why this is needed:
> -------------------
> OF has taken the industry by a storm and has shaped the SDN
> world. ForCES has been doing SDN for years.
> It is of informational  value to compare and contrast ForCES with
> OF.
> It is is of informational value to show that ForCES can be used in
> conjunction or in place of OF.
> It is valuable as well to learn technically from OF on how we could
> add missing useful features to ForCES.
>
> Please respond whether you:
> a) are interested in doing the work
> b) will review the work
> c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG
> d) do not think we should do this work
>
> cheers,
> jamal
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>