Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship

Jamal, am also interested in doing/reviewing the work. --dmm

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> Jamal:
>
> I'm interested in:
> a) doing the work (will post an updated draft this week) - yes
> b) reviewing any work - yes
> c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG - yes
> d) do not think we should do this work - [false] we should do the work.
>
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: forces-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jamal Hadi Salim
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:48 AM
> To: forces@ietf.org
> Subject: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship
>
> [I know it is still slow week - but we gotta complete going over these
> suggested work items]
>
> What it is
> ----------
> Illustration of OpenFlow to ForCES relationship.
> Refer to:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow-lib/
>
> Why this is needed:
> -------------------
> OF has taken the industry by a storm and has shaped the SDN world. ForCES
> has been doing SDN for years.
> It is of informational  value to compare and contrast ForCES with OF.
> It is is of informational value to show that ForCES can be used in
> conjunction or in place of OF.
> It is valuable as well to learn technically from OF on how we could add
> missing useful features to ForCES.
>
> Please respond whether you:
> a) are interested in doing the work
> b) will review the work
> c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG
> d) do not think we should do this work
>
> cheers,
> jamal
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces