Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship
"Haleplidis Evangelos" <ehalep@ece.upatras.gr> Thu, 03 January 2013 12:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ehalep@ece.upatras.gr>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2501721F8599 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:40:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.945, BAYES_05=-1.11, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Whe4ZKW6+9Bc for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.ece.upatras.gr (mailgate1.ece.upatras.gr [150.140.189.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270A021F8477 for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EhalepXPS (150.140.254.10) by mailgate1 (Axigen) with ESMTPA id 3D5EC1; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:43:18 +0200
From: Haleplidis Evangelos <ehalep@ece.upatras.gr>
To: 'Jamal Hadi Salim' <hadi@mojatatu.com>, forces@ietf.org
References: <CAAFAkD_TbB-hi7PvxsJUr2gu7dsEF7MO1y_SZuApY_E4ru0xHg@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP14216D338D11029AE50B1C7C9210@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP14216D338D11029AE50B1C7C9210@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:39:55 +0200
Message-ID: <004901cde9af$71ddc3c0$55994b40$@upatras.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-Language: el
Thread-index: Ac3prS3DOQCL2ShQSMq/T/D0NHxvlwAAgQDQ
Subject: Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:40:02 -0000
Greetings, For the reasons Jamal stated below, I think it's clear that this work must be done in the wg (therefore we support c)) And as we are already participating in this effort we will of course support a) & b) Regards, Evangelos Haleplidis. > -----Original Message----- > From: forces-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Wang,Weiming > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:21 PM > To: Jamal Hadi Salim; forces@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship > > Evangelos has been doing excellent work on this item. If needed, my > team will be willing to help the work in some way. > > So, a), b), and c) with 'might be done in the WG'. > > thanks, > Weiming > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@mojatatu.com> > > > [I know it is still slow week - but we gotta complete going over > these > > suggested work items] > > > > What it is > > ---------- > > Illustration of OpenFlow to ForCES relationship. > > Refer to: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow- > lib/ > > > > Why this is needed: > > ------------------- > > OF has taken the industry by a storm and has shaped the SDN world. > > ForCES has been doing SDN for years. > > It is of informational value to compare and contrast ForCES with > OF. > > It is is of informational value to show that ForCES can be used in > > conjunction or in place of OF. > > It is valuable as well to learn technically from OF on how we could > > add missing useful features to ForCES. > > > > Please respond whether you: > > a) are interested in doing the work > > b) will review the work > > c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG > > d) do not think we should do this work > > > > cheers, > > jamal > > _______________________________________________ > > forces mailing list > > forces@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces > > > _______________________________________________ > forces mailing list > forces@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Wang,Weiming
- [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Haleplidis Evangelos
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Christian Esteve Rothenberg
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Susan Hares
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship David Meyer
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Joel
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship B.Khasnabish@ieee.org
- Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship Jamal Hadi Salim