Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship

Best wishes for 2013,

here is my individual position on this matter:
b) will review the work
c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG

Greetings,
Christian

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Haleplidis Evangelos
<ehalep@ece.upatras.gr> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> For the reasons Jamal stated below, I think it's clear that this work must
> be done in the wg (therefore we support c))
>
> And as we are already participating in this effort we will of course support
> a) & b)
>
> Regards,
> Evangelos Haleplidis.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: forces-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Wang,Weiming
>> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:21 PM
>> To: Jamal Hadi Salim; forces@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship
>>
>> Evangelos has been doing  excellent work on this item. If needed, my
>> team will be willing to help the work in some way.
>>
>> So, a), b),  and c) with 'might be done in the WG'.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Weiming
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@mojatatu.com>
>>
>> > [I know it is still slow week - but we gotta complete going over
>> these
>> > suggested work items]
>> >
>> > What it is
>> > ----------
>> > Illustration of OpenFlow to ForCES relationship.
>> > Refer to:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow/
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow-
>> lib/
>> >
>> > Why this is needed:
>> > -------------------
>> > OF has taken the industry by a storm and has shaped the SDN world.
>> > ForCES has been doing SDN for years.
>> > It is of informational  value to compare and contrast ForCES with
>>  OF.
>> > It is is of informational value to show that ForCES can be used in
>> > conjunction or in place of OF.
>> > It is valuable as well to learn technically from OF on how we could
>> > add missing useful features to ForCES.
>> >
>> > Please respond whether you:
>> > a) are interested in doing the work
>> > b) will review the work
>> > c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG
>> > d) do not think we should do this work
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > jamal
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > forces mailing list
>> > forces@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> forces mailing list
>> forces@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces

-- 
Christian