Re: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship

Jamal:

I'm interested in:
a) doing the work (will post an updated draft this week) - yes 
b) reviewing any work - yes 
c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG - yes 
d) do not think we should do this work - [false] we should do the work.

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: forces-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Jamal Hadi Salim
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:48 AM
To: forces@ietf.org
Subject: [forces] item #9: Openflow Relationship

[I know it is still slow week - but we gotta complete going over these
suggested work items]

What it is
----------
Illustration of OpenFlow to ForCES relationship.
Refer to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-forces-vs-openflow/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haleplidis-forces-openflow-lib/

Why this is needed:
-------------------
OF has taken the industry by a storm and has shaped the SDN world. ForCES
has been doing SDN for years.
It is of informational  value to compare and contrast ForCES with OF.
It is is of informational value to show that ForCES can be used in
conjunction or in place of OF.
It is valuable as well to learn technically from OF on how we could add
missing useful features to ForCES.

Please respond whether you:
a) are interested in doing the work
b) will review the work
c) find the work interesting and it should be done in the WG
d) do not think we should do this work

cheers,
jamal
_______________________________________________
forces mailing list
forces@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces