Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration

On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Randy Turner wrote:

> "without active administration" should probably be the goal regardless of topology..,

+1

- Mark

> 
> Randy
> 
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:16 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:52 PM 6/27/11, David Harrington wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> This sounds more like the description of an IRTF RG than an IETF WG.
>>> The ***engineering*** apparently is not yet clearly understood, and
>>> the "specific protocol work described below" is not at all specific.
>> 
>> [...] with the major constraint that a simple network of a few links and routers has to operate with active admin intervention.
>> 
>> s/with active admin intervention/without active admin intervention/
>> 
>> - Ralph
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> fun mailing list
>> fun@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> fun mailing list
> fun@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun