IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration

Randy Turner <rturner@amalfisystems.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rturner@amalfisystems.com>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8332A21F8546; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFP1qZlnGJD4; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3110321F8506; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5SE6j4w022816; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:06:47 -0400
X-Authenticated-IP: 174.254.67.139
Received: from [174.254.67.139] ([174.254.67.139:48505] helo=[10.224.112.70]) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from <rturner@amalfisystems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTP id 34/D2-10086-0FFD90E4; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:06:45 -0400
References: <4E031DCD.1010606@piuha.net> <BEF28DA8BF08419EA670A910D2438F28@davidPC> <A1B5DD3D-84B7-49BF-B02C-1E44346768AC@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A1B5DD3D-84B7-49BF-B02C-1E44346768AC@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E401)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <3A1DC425-BF54-4CD1-A7D4-5AF668680DB5@amalfisystems.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8E401)
From: Randy Turner <rturner@amalfisystems.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:06:34 -0700
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Cc: "ipdir@ietf.org" <ipdir@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "fun@ietf.org" <fun@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:06:52 -0000

"without active administration" should probably be the goal regardless of topology..,

Randy

On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:16 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:52 PM 6/27/11, David Harrington wrote:
>> [...]
>> This sounds more like the description of an IRTF RG than an IETF WG.
>> The ***engineering*** apparently is not yet clearly understood, and
>> the "specific protocol work described below" is not at all specific.
> 
> [...] with the major constraint that a simple network of a few links and routers has to operate with active admin intervention.
> 
> s/with active admin intervention/without active admin intervention/
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fun mailing list
> fun@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email