IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 29 June 2011 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE7C21F86B2; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.949, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_MARKET=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBojA0gQYcpy; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18E321F86B1; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D952CC3B; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:30:25 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54eG0TaQrxaM; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:30:22 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DD52CC39; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:30:17 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4E0AD489.7020002@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:30:17 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
References: <4E031DCD.1010606@piuha.net> <BEF28DA8BF08419EA670A910D2438F28@davidPC> <A1B5DD3D-84B7-49BF-B02C-1E44346768AC@cisco.com> <3A1DC425-BF54-4CD1-A7D4-5AF668680DB5@amalfisystems.com> <A2814605-A8F9-43BB-8B3F-993FE975E2F8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2814605-A8F9-43BB-8B3F-993FE975E2F8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ipdir@ietf.org" <ipdir@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "fun@ietf.org" <fun@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:30:28 -0000

Randy, Mark, et al -- I agree about the without active administration 
part, of course. But was there a change in the charter text that you 
wanted based on this exchange?

Jari

Mark Townsley kirjoitti:
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Randy Turner wrote:
>
>   
>> "without active administration" should probably be the goal regardless of topology..,
>>     
>
> +1
>
> - Mark
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email