IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509721F85AE; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luzlUgNSjN0l; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7166821F85BE; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rdroms@cisco.com; l=504; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1309256206; x=1310465806; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DJDSsBDd4YJiwj1BF4SIdxDUmX6liLG6yzW/rRQFOIE=; b=kLNgYvdTYqDNkS+F4CeVYl5X6gzFZUQvLlNAJLob3EpAjvgv20MimOHG zMyLR2fIaMk7sAyxCtUPPYlz1FLp/7AxwxJx5XWQdtNUyCvyNY1LG8hfj cX8mYmT71lSXDqXmnfBCqoTw6qs3l7S0llrjEQQqq/m6wBHXfZ+fcLJfj U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,436,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="39620845"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2011 10:16:42 +0000
Received: from bxb-rdroms-8718.cisco.com (bxb-rdroms-8718.cisco.com [10.98.10.89]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5SAGfwv008080; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:42 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEF28DA8BF08419EA670A910D2438F28@davidPC>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:16:41 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1B5DD3D-84B7-49BF-B02C-1E44346768AC@cisco.com>
References: <4E031DCD.1010606@piuha.net> <BEF28DA8BF08419EA670A910D2438F28@davidPC>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: ipdir@ietf.org, 'IAB' <iab@iab.org>, 'IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, fun@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [fun] Revised homenet charter for IESG consideration
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:16:47 -0000

On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:52 PM 6/27/11, David Harrington wrote:
> [...]
> This sounds more like the description of an IRTF RG than an IETF WG.
> The ***engineering*** apparently is not yet clearly understood, and
> the "specific protocol work described below" is not at all specific.

[...] with the major constraint that a simple network of a few links and routers has to operate with active admin intervention.

s/with active admin intervention/without active admin intervention/

- Ralph

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email