IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Fri, 01 July 2011 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADABB11E81B9; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vTni4UzN5Hd; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0B011E815B; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 069D218C14E; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
To: fun@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20110701204301.069D218C14E@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:43:01 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:28:53 -0700
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:43:02 -0000

    > From: Kenneth Voort <listbounce-01@voort.ca>

    > future IPv6 capable devices should allow end users to reach the IPv6
    > Internet from an IPv4-only provider through some means, perhaps
    > tunneling, with no or minimal administrator intervention.

<Innocent face=on>
You mean, like with 6to4?
<Innocent face=off>

(Sorry, couldn't resist! :-)

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email